*Atlantic Cataclysm*

The author is David Eltis and the subtitle is Rethinking the Atlantic Slave Trades.  Here is one summary passage:

While Europe’s role in the slave trade may have been secondary it can scarcely be described as minor.  The traffic was broadly based, with ninety-six European ports dispatching at least one voyage to Africa.  Almost every port large enough to initiate transoceanic trade participated in the business.  Owners, their employees and, most important, the public had unquestioning support for the business until the last quarter of the eighteenth century.  The Portuguese and Spanish created the Atlantic slave-trading system, and they were the last to abandon it.  They dispatched more voyages and carried off far more enslaved women and men than did the British throughout the era.

Eltis also writes:

Generally, the new data reveals a sense of equality between buyer and seller on the African littoral, at least until late in the slave trade era…Africanists have yet to take on board new population estimates for African regions in 1850 and match these with new estimates of the exodus of people that are now available.  It now seems unlikely that outside influences transformed the nature of slavery in Africa.

And note:

…only four other jurisdictions in the Americas received more African captives than Barbados.

A very useful and important book on what is (yes) still a topic underrated in import.