Markets in Everything: World Babies

…Prospective parents put off by the rigor of traditional adoptions are bypassing that system by producing babies of their own–often using an egg donor from one country, a sperm donor from another, and a surrogate who will deliver in a third country to make what some industry participants call "a world baby."

They turn to PlanetHospital and a handful of other companies. "We take care of all aspects of the process, like a concierge service," says Mr. Rupak, a 41-year-old Canadian.

…During one client meeting over tea in Chicago, Mr. Rupak first answers a question about the possibility of breast-feeding if you're not the birth mother. Then, as the conversation wraps up, he says: "I have some good news for you. We'll be offering you and your husband complimentary teeth-cleaning while you're in Hyderabad."

From the WSJ, interesting throughout.

Comments

It's the fact that seemingly half the women in America are barren, that enables this practice to grow.

Comments for this post are closed

Should change clause above to read: "or else constitutional rights could not be extended to the unborn as some claim"

Typing from Ipad.

Comments for this post are closed

The problem is moral hazard: The surrogate mothers who do the pregnancy part of the business do not have to pay the costs of behaving in a way that reduces the baby's utility after it is delivered.

Comments for this post are closed

Sonorama, how many people are going to spend $32,000 to bring a baby to term, then not accept it? I'd predict that the number would be vanishingly small.

Comments for this post are closed

The world baby is a great idea for spados!

baby monitor

Comments for this post are closed

Christopher R., if the $32,000 baby was unexpectedly born deformed, with genetic defects, or any number of maladies, I can easily see the parents "bowing out" of the process. The $32,000 would just been seen as a "sunk cost," and they could always try creating another life again. The WSJ article did mention two surrogate moms being ordered to abort one each of a pair of twins. One has to wonder how much say they have in the matter.

The point I am emphasizing here is that the people ordering up surrogates to deliver children from donor eggs and sperm are creating a NEW life. This isn't like adoption, which presumably SUBTRACTS from the number of destitute or parentless children. This has the potential to ADD to those numbers.

I realize that this opens up huge possibilities for many would-be parents to have a child outside of the normal channels. But it appears that some countries are diving headfirst into this phenomenon without a clue of what can go wrong let alone a plan to deal with it.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed