Words that men are most likely to recognize over women

  • codec (88, 48)
  • solenoid (87, 54)
  • golem (89, 56)
  • mach (93, 63)
  • humvee (88, 58)
  • claymore (87, 589
  • scimitar (86, 58)
  • kevlar (93, 65)
  • paladin (93, 66)
  • bolshevism (85, 60)
  • biped (86, 61)
  • dreadnought (90, 66)

That is from Christina Sterbenz.  Here are the words women are most likely to recognize over men:

  • taffeta (48, 87)
  • tresses (61, 93)
  • bottlebrush (58, 89)
  • flouncy (55, 86)
  • mascarpone (60, 90)
  • decoupage (56, 86)
  • progesterone (63, 92)
  • wisteria (61, 89)
  • taupe (66, 93)
  • flouncing (67, 94)
  • peony (70, 96)
  • bodice (71, 96)

…The male words tend to center on transportation, weapons, and science, while the female words mostly relate to fashion, art, and flowers.

The article is here, hat tip Yana.

Comments

I think you mean the male words tend to center on Dungeons & Dragons, which is where I learned the words golem, scimitar, and paladin.

Comments for this post are closed

I knew every word except flouncy/flouncing.

I don't need to know those.

Comments for this post are closed

is Claymore the two handed sword or the mine? Points for recongnizing both? I think I had to explain it to my wife.

I thought it was an oil rig.

Comments for this post are closed

I of course recognize both as well, but I'm not sure if one should get points from getting their knowledge from video games.

Do you recognize the word curmudgeon? ;)

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Don't forget the Manga series!

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

This male knew every word on those two lists.

We're all very impressed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Shouldn't that second to last sentence be in quotes, since it is a direct citation from the link?

the thin gray line implies quotation... unless it's been modified since you posted this, then my apologies

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Silly test.
Took it.
I think everyone should know 90% of both lists.

Well, I'm sure they do ... in Lake Wobegon.

Comments for this post are closed

I didn't. Am I stupid?

Well, it doesn't help your case...

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Also how to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.

But, well, here we are.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Hmm, I can think of two meanings for "bottlebrush", but now I have a nagging feeling that there is a third, girly meaning that I am hilariously innocent of.

I tried using a bottlebrush once and still have the scars to prove it.

A sure sign that you're reading too much Urban Dictionary.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Guys learn all those words playing video games.

Maybe not bolshevism, but I've certainly seen every one of the other words off of the Male list in either a board or video game.

Comments for this post are closed

What kind of video game has words like "decoupage" "progesterone"? Oh, and you misspelled "Gays."

Steve Sailor has written a computer game based on World War T? That would about do it.

In fact "World War T: The Bloodening" could credibly use every single one of those words.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

bulshit

go to a walmart or michael's and as a woman what a 'mascarpone' or a 'decoupage ' is and expect blank states. Maybe 1/2000 women would know what those are. ditto for the male list

not sure how you would make a generalization for obscure words unless you sampled a ton of people

Actually I'd expect women at a craft store like Michael's to recognize decoupage. Mascarpone? Intensely regional. I'd never seen it in America until I moved to Upstate New York, in Wegman's range.

It's rife on the Food Channel. Not that I watch.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

There's a difference between recognize and knowing the meaning. I may know that taffeta, tresses and bottlebrush are real words used in English, but I could also not know the precise definitions. The article indicates it is just recognition so that makes it more interesting. These are words one sex or the other thinks are not real words.

Comments for this post are closed

Real alpha males don't need to be told this.

I make a crack about sexually ambiguous beta males and I get a stalker.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I knew a couple of these words. And have used some in a sentence: "I removed her taffeta bodice at mach speed with my scimitar" (after the appropriate invitation to do so, of course).

I see you have choosing more refined weapons in these centuries Thor. I guess these modern-day taffeta-clad Valkyries don't go in for hammer chic.

Comments for this post are closed

Ye regards the faire maiden reading yonder scrolle in ye pub, drinking from ye flask.

Y is really thorn and it's pronounced like th!

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I recognize women over all those words!

Comments for this post are closed

I have very high confidence in defining the words on the male list. On the female list, there are a couple I couldn't even hazard a guess and others in which I'm not very confident. Interestingly enough, my wife had the opposite experience. Our vocabularies are so stereotypical.

>Our vocabularies are so stereotypical.

By which you mean typical.

Stereotypical, meaning typical on both sides.

(Get it, because stereo is music that comes from both the left and right sides? *tap tap* Is this thing on?)

monotypical if you're single

prototypical if you're a fetus.

Comments for this post are closed

Atypical if you're not.

Comments for this post are closed

Ectopical if one thinks outside the box.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Sexism! Gender Binary-ism! Fascism!
Lies, all of these.
Also, all socially constructed. In twenty years the opposite could be true. YOU DONT KNOW THAT IT COULDNT!

To be more serious, I missed 1 word in the male list, and 5 in the female list, so this works for me.

Comments for this post are closed

Clearly vocabulary is genetically controlled, not socially contingent.

Studies in monkeys show that infant monkeys prefer gender-normative toys. That is little baby girl monkeys will play with dolls, little baby boy monkeys, not so much. In humans an interest in something usually means acquiring a larger and more complex vocabulary relating to that interest. There are not a lot of places a person of either gender is going to come across taffeta unless they are seeking out interior design tips.

So, basically, yes and no. Vocabulary may be socially contingent, but that social context is determined to some extent by genes.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Calling the first set of words related to "science" is a stretch—perhaps an indicator of subtle bias at work.

"Codec" and "solonoid" versus "progesterone." Science v. flowers?

"Calling the first set of words related to “science” is a stretch"

Maybe you could pedantically insist that codec and solenoid should better be classed as related to technology, but I think most people would find that a quibble.

And if you're going to make a pedantic criticism, then perhaps you should read the article with better attention to detail.

"while the female words mostly relate to fashion, art, and flowers. "

Chill out there bud. I wasn't trying to be pedantic—just noting that one more arguably "science" word in the men's list versus the women's seems to me a pretty weak reason to draw a distinction. And noting that there's a longstanding bias against and underrepresentation of women in the sciences.

And I noticed that he used the word "mostly," just like he used the phrase "tends to center on." I read the two as equivalent in that sentence, meaning: these are the concepts from which the words in this list are primarily drawn.

My point was about bias confirmation, not about whether to classify codec and solenoid as technology or science.

Hmm, ok fair enough.

But then wouldn't the more apt comparison be: weapons v. flowers?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I would guess 80% of the male recognition of codec is related to intern pr0n.

*internet

Tell that to Bill Clinton. And you have to admit, that when it comes to intern porn, he knows all about coding and decoding.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I'm really puzzled why bottlebrush keeps coming up in this thread. It's a compound noun. A brush for cleaning bottles. There is also a plant that looks like a brush for cleaning bottles.

Also chalk a win up for the religious right with progesterone being on that list.

"Also chalk a win up for the religious right with progesterone being on that list."

Could you explain this comment?

Easy. All Christians want to get pregnant and harvest offspring. All atheists like to abort and kill babies.

Comments for this post are closed

I expect more men would know what progesterone was if we had more in depth discussion of birth control methods at the high school level.

Most forms of the pill are various levels of progesterone and estrogen.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

This is why I am now convinced that there is a third meaning that you are I are oblivious to. That means that your comment has just demonstrated your utter folly and ignorance. I am at peace with my own ignorance.

The major application of bottlebrushes is cleaning baby bottles, right? So I thought that was the girly usage. And the cave thing and the plant are guyish.

But I'm not willing to Google this at work, lest I'm horrifically wrong.

You're not. Google's full of pages and pages of plants and baby bottle cleaning tools. It might be the safest search you ever do on Google.

Thanks.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

My background in historical re-creation (and thus sewing), and graphic design pays off.

I knew all the words on both lists.

But relevantly, Z is right.

This is not a list of words each gender could define or use in a sentence - it's a list of gendered recognition on a split second, in a field of potential nonsense words; that's rather different.

I'm not sure it's more interesting, but it's different.

Comments for this post are closed

The men probably got confused between decoupage and decolletage.

Really? Decoupage isn't what you do when you separate the railway cars from each other and send them to their different destinations?

Thank God for that. I was beginning to be worried about my sexual orientation as I knew all the one's on the women's list and the only one I did not know is in the men's list - codec. But then a lot of them have rather vague definitions. Does it count as knowing if you say a solenoid is an electronics-thingy found in, you know, electronic things? How precise does a definition have to be before it counts? And perhaps I am just fooling myself - perhaps this is a case of Rumsfeld-type known-unknowns?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

We need a French economist to teach us how we can rid the world of such unbearable inequality. It is simply immoral!

Comments for this post are closed

The last word in the second list suggests that the respondents to the survey were mainly adults living alone in their moms' basements.

Comments for this post are closed

Well, those lists sure Shatter Stereotypes!

Comments for this post are closed

"The male words tend to center on transportation, weapons, and science, while the female words mostly relate to fashion, art, and flowers."
Thank you for the Y Chromosome, Dad.

Comments for this post are closed

I thought I recognized decoupage, but I was really thinking of decalage. Hmm.

I was thinking of "decolletage"...

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I am confused about the design of this study ... and thus am not sure how to interpret these results. I clicked through to BI and learned the gender differences above are "statistically significant" (I would hope so with 500k sample sizes) but when I clicked on to the research center's page I cannot find info on the sample design (I may be overlooking it). It is clear they have a ton of online tests completed but I can't figure out by whom (that is, what population are they sampling from). These results may not tell about vocabulary differences in English-speaking men and women ... they may simply tell us that the men and women who frequent the Internet speak 'different languages' or have more divergent interests than the general population (not sure I needed a survey to tell me that). Still it is kind of an interesting word test.

It's not really about men and women as much as it is about those particular words. At best what this post is about is what if anything those words say about men and women. But it is basically what we already knew.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I had assumed that "decoupage" was like embonpoint.

As for the words one learns from computer games: aren't you using "men" in some narrow, technical sense?

Comments for this post are closed

Definitely holds true for this male. I instantly recognize all the male words and understand their referents and usage in great detail. After a moment, recognize the female words and think I know basically what they mean, although not with great confidence or in great detail.

Taffeta: Frilly stuff on clothes, I think. Is it a special kind of frill or any frill?
Tresses: Aren't those cross-beams on a roof or bridge?
Mascarpone: A desert ingredient, kind of sweet cream cheese, I think.
Taupe: A color, kind of a brown, I think, although I don't know what kind.
Peony: Misspelling of pony? Oh, wait, some kind of flower, although I don't know what kind.

That would be a truss, not a tress. Which I would use (or rather not use) to refer to women's hair.

A peony is a type of flower common in East Asia. There is a Chinese play named after it. I would not recommend it for my worst enemy.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

They seem to be saying that solenoid, which is a part for car, and mach, which is a measure airplane velocities, are a scientific terms but names of flowers are not.

Nice point.

Comments for this post are closed

And, gee, here I was all this time thinking that airplanes and cars were both forms of transportation.

Stupid me.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Is there an age component to the word recognition? I don't have the book handy, but I'm pretty sure that a cat in one of the Harry Potter books is described as having a "bottlebrush tail". Female author, but I've never heard that the readership tended strongly toward one sex or the other.

Comments for this post are closed

I recognized peony as a type of burst pattern in a firework, and I recognized the taupe because I once briefly owned a taupe-colored jeep.

Comments for this post are closed

I challenge the findings of this study:

Ask any red blooded man:

Do you understand what a flouncy and bouncy taffeta bodice is and they will tell you,

You betcha.

Comments for this post are closed

Bill took his flouncy taupe codec downstairs - as a biped he was well within his right to take a bottlebrush to it - maybe even a scimitar. The codec had shown too much cleavage and excessive attention to its tresses and he was having none of it. This flouncing stuff was over for good. He wiped the mascarpone from his face, kicked the planter filled with wisteria his wife had made at her lame adult-ed class, and pondered his potential new existence as a kevlar solenoid should he now take action. Moving quickly, he grabbed his claymore and excised the offending bodice at mach speed in a decisive rejection of the impending bolshevism. Now he planned his escape. Alertly chugging a bottle of progesterone, he wrapped himself in a tafetta scarf, started his humvee and headed for parts unknown. He may not have been a golem, but his dreadnought had clearly sailed.

++1

Comments for this post are closed

Hm. Just one question: was that a "lame (adult-ed class)" or a "(lame adult-ed) class"?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

When n = 60,000, by random chance you are going to get some hits at the p<0.05 level.

This is a good example of the validity of published, peer-reviewed papers in fields like psychology and economics being about 0.05

No, because the words where there are huge sex differences (e.g., scimitar) are obviously legitimate rather than inexplicable randomness.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Often, academic studies have little relevance in the real world.

This study is an exception.

It tells you not to name a woman's perfume

Codec

By Coty.

Maybe, but I bet you could name a tavern "The Flouncing Bodice".

+1 My dreadnought gets aroused just thinking about it.

+1 So does my claymore.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Or instead of "Polo", imagine "Donkey Basketball".

Comments for this post are closed

I once started a robotics company and called it the Golem Group. In my naivete, I thought that many people knew what a golem was: if only from Dungeons & Dragons.

I can now absolutely guarantee it is NOT true that 89% of men know what a "golem" is.

Probably most of that 89% thought they were recognizing a character from The Lord of the Rings.

I would be like "stone golem or mud golem?"

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

In terms of words women and men use, the most diagnostic in predicting gender (for a unrepresentatively youthful sample!) are

kinship related positive emotion terms and words that portray them as unformidable (women)

vs

conflict terms, large scale political terms and words that help them portrary themselves as formidable (males)

http://assets2.motherboard.tv/content-images/contentimage/no-slug/cca5d5f986df595ab4d4c3be9b8702d5.jpg

That doesn't mean that's what they feel* but that's certainly what they seem to use communication relatively more for - women for building and maintaining kinship and nurturance relationships and appearing unthreatening, men for building and maintaining (and defusing?) competitive and political relationships and appearing too dangerous to mess with.

*More on this - women seem to use more positive emotion words, yet may not necessarily feel more positive. You see higher diagnoses of depression and anxiety in women and comparable levels of anger. However, women are more committed to not stressing out their support, even as they generally tend to be more mutually supportive, so you see this kind of communication bias. In the same way, men may not actually *feel* more bellicose.

Comments for this post are closed

I will claymore your claymore with my claymore.

Comments for this post are closed

Weird that women are less likely to understand "Bolshevism". That doesn't seem to fit with the other words on the male list.

Bolshevism has a pretty strong relationship with killing, neh?

Comments for this post are closed

Men tend to have more political-economic interest than women. Strange that this word in particular slipped into the top twelve, though.

I stil think this looks like a sample of male gamers and female Pinterest users ... the probabilities attached to a lot of these words look strange to me. I suspect differences would emerge in a representative sample too but it might not be as stark. Oh and even in this research I bet the different by gender words are tiny fraction of all the recognized words (we are more alike than we are different).

Women pinterest users -- that made me laugh -- pretty spot on.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Definition of DREADNOUGHT
1: a warm garment of thick cloth; also : the cloth

Comments for this post are closed

Can't believe I almost missed this comment thread. Brilliant.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed