Todd, a loyal MR reader, writes to me:
My kids are 11, 8, and 5. They go to the great [redacted] School. So far, they’ve been exposed to zero economic ideas. None. Why is this? Why do they learn about Beowulf, the Underground Railroad, and Spanish, but no basic economics? In fact, looking back at my own primary education, I had no exposure either. What explains the absence of basic economics education in primary education? Wouldn’t giving every kid an intuitive grasp of econ 101 at a very early age work a profound improvement on the state of private and public decision making in this country? Are we just a really good textbook (aimed at maybe 4th – 6th graders) away from big social gains?
I have heard related tales from others, so what are the possible explanations?
1. K-12 teachers do not themselves understand economics.
2. It is much easier to teach and test historical facts and Spanish grammar than economic concepts. Note that many high school economics classes seem to devote a lot of attention to business taxonomy rather than actually thinking like an economist.
3. K-12 administrators may be hostile to economic reasoning, since said reasoning may paint some of them in a less than flattering light.
Anything else? That all said, AP economics seems to be growing at a decent clip over the last twenty years, and in some states such as Texas senior-level economics is now required. But at lower levels? The progress is much less evident.
Here are some not always so useful discussion threads on this query.