Just received verbal govt approval for The Boring Company to build an underground NY-Phil-Balt-DC Hyperloop. NY-DC in 29 mins.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 20, 2017
Adam Ozimek asks me:
How should we think about this in a meta-rational sense? https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/20/16003766/elon-musk-boring-company-hyperloop-nyc-philadelphia-baltimore-dc
…What should we make of it?
To be clear, I have never had interaction with Elon Musk, so I intend these as general possibilities, rather than as commentary on his individual personality:
1. There are some people who on Twitter will just “fuck with us.” Precisely because they have done a lot in the so-called “real world,” they just don’t take Twitter that seriously.
2. Some very successful people are programmed to rhetorically overreach. This makes them the center of attention and furthermore keeps them motivated. They don’t apply the same kind of “reality filter” to their rhetoric that a scientist might.
3. Sometimes exaggeration is used to distract from pending failures, a’la Trump, and this process may include self-distraction. (Tesla?)
4. Exaggeration is a way to keep the hyperloop on the agenda and in the mindset of the nerdy public. Eventually that will help make the hyperloop possible. Speakers with this motive often think of themselves as bootstrapping the reality, rather than “making stuff up.”
Most of talk isn’t about reporting the truth! In this sense the tweet isn’t surprising at all.
And what the heck is “verbal government approval” in a world with federalism, multiple layers of environmental review, NIMBY homeowners, and courts of varying jurisdictions? I like to think the tweet might be an act of sarcastic protest, or Straussian meta-commentary born out of frustration, but somehow I suspect neither of those is the case.