Results for “Larry Summers” 197 found
How much of the value of the internet is not captured in gdp?
I have been hearing this question more and more lately, even in China. Overall I think it has gone from an underrated effect to an overrated effect. Tim Worstall offers an introduction to this debate.
Let’s not forget that you do in fact pay for Facebook access, indirectly, when you pay for your cable connection, your iPad, and your smart phone. including the monthly bill, all of which are part of measured gdp. The more value Facebook brings you, the more you would be willing to pay for these goods and services. The same is true for Google and the like. So Facebook and other internet services are part of a bundled package of market value, but that is very different from claiming they are not measured in gdp at all.
There is of course consumer surplus from the internet and Facebook, just as there is from Dunkin’ Donuts. Might that consumer surplus be especially high? Well, we don’t know, but don’t assume it will be. I did some casual googling, and found a number of estimates suggesting that smart phone demand is relatively price elastic, with the iPhone a possible exception to that regularity. That implies consumer surplus isn’t especially high, because many people aren’t willing to buy at the higher price. I thus think Brad DeLong is far too optimistic in his estimates of ratio consumer surplus to market price.
You also could look at the literature on the demand for cable internet services. The results are mixed, but again I don’t see a strong case for a disproportionately high consumer surplus from these services, if anything the contrary.
Now maybe these estimates are wrong, or looking at the wrong margin in some way, but the fact that I hear them mentioned so rarely gives me pause. Cowen’s Third Law.
There is also advertising over the internet. Let’s say Facebook is a profit maximizer. Insofar as Facebook is of value to consumers, the company can get away with putting a lot of ads on the site. These will spur additional market purchases, and so part of the value of the site is again captured in gdp. Obviously some of these ad effects are simply expenditure-switching, and so there is no full capture of value, but still Facebook shows up in gdp statistics in yet another way.
Here are some previous posts on this topic.
Tuesday assorted links
1. Santoor music from Iran (short video).
2. Dean Baker on inequality and mobility and me.
3. Delong on Bernanke, Summers, and Krugman and how they think.
4. An ideological Turing simulation of certain Straussian ideas. By Will Wilkinson.
5. Brad DeLong’s arguments for more government, Paul Krugman comments. I see too quick a move from “funder” to “provider” in both sets of remarks. Furthermore most of the hyperbolic argument doesn’t imply much more than a series of low budgetary cost legal mandates, or perhaps nudges. It does not imply a massive expansion of the state sector, quite the contrary. On top of that, government agents and voters presumably are hyperbolic as well.
Assorted links
1. Soda taxes don’t seem to work.
2. Can a health care company actually satisfy the customer?
3. How hard is it to become really good at table tennis? And the common law origins of the infield fly rule.
4. Summers responds to Bernanke. And Robert Moses responds to Robert Caro. And Bernanke on the global savings glut.
Other links
Assorted links
1. Book preview for 2015. Good stuff, including volume four of Knausgaard, a new Stephenson, a new Gaiman, a new Ishiguro, a Philip Glass memoir, perhaps the Niall Ferguson book on Kissinger will be interesting too. Here is another preview list. And who was nominated for a literary Nobel Prize in 1964.
2. The pick-up culture that is Chinese.
3. Another (right-wing?) view on why the leading public intellectual economists are left-wing. And more from Krugman.
4. Voodoo and Haitian mental health. And the culture that is Singapore.
Tuesday assorted links
1. “Ekki staðalbúnaður í smalamennsku!” With video, of course, and implying the advantages of water transport.
3. Steven Landsburg makes some good points, but Summers may be able to invoke threshold effects.
4. Harvard faculty actually seem to hate the best parts of Obamacare. Bravo to this article. And quick summaries of evidence-based medicine.
5. “I’m the poster child of evil [art] speculation…” An excellent piece, also NYT.
6. How big is the sexism problem in economics? Kimball and anon.
Assorted links
1. How the Chinese mimic foreign brands.
2. Using DNA to catch canine culprits.
3. The David Beckworth criticisms of secular stagnation theories. Just for review, here is the longest Summers statement of the theory I know of.
4. Are the arts dead in New York City? I say “no,” but I couldn’t help but notice that those arguing “no” in this piece made the best case for the “yes” point of view.
5. “Fire Sale: How the Asset Buying Binge of the Great Depression Changed America.”
Assorted links
1. Are people biased against black dogs?
2. Kickstarter in Everything (potato salad, average is over).
3. Jeff Koons employs 128 people.
5. Mining the streets of New York City. And peer review rings at the Journal of Vibration and Control.
6. Another 677 pp. from William Vollmann and can you guess the topic?
7. Is there a strategic trade policy justification for Ex-Im?
Assorted links
Assorted links
1. Is internal devaluation boosting Greek exports much?
2. In praise of the London Review of Books. And updated economics on the NYT paywall.
3. The NIH is culling the number of labs it supports.
5. The new Summers version of the secular stagnation argument doesn’t seem to rely on negative natural rates of interest. That said, it is getting closer to a supply-side version of the view.
Assorted links
1. Quandl searches economics and financial databases.
3. Anatomy of a robocar accident.
4. Child guesses the plots of classic novels, based on book covers, via Yana.
5. The dining culture that is Missouri.
6. Summers and Hubbard on basketball and economics, but Davidson is the real star here. And will we eradicate global poverty?
Assorted links
1. The truly important use for drones.
2. Peter Orszag on competitive bidding for Medicare.
3. Comments from an Irish burglar, and Caplan defends Bastiat.
4. The culture that is Finland, don’t miss the tag at the end.
6. What levels of immigration would be needed…?
7. Dean Baker on how much housing policy could have helped.
That’s a lot of links for today but they are worthy.
Assorted links
1. Who dies from Russian roulette?
2. Interview with the new GMU President, Ángel Cabrera.
3. Lawrence Summers on government growth (very good piece), or try this link, and a Reihan follow-up.
4. Sokurov’s Faust will be out on DVD soon, it has received rave reviews.
5. Updated results on right to carry laws, and Medicaid seems to improve black child mortality but perhaps not white child mortality.
Assorted links
1. Dan Drezner has a very good post on the future of the United States.
2. Is cybersecurity a public good?
3. Tom Vanderbilt on driverless cars, and the new world of private aerial drones.
4. The 57-page Summers memo on fiscal stimulus (pdf, btw I have not read it yet). Kevin Drum adds comment.
5. Is there a connection between social values and economic stagnation?
Very good sentences
"I’m one of the few people who went to Washington to get out of politics."
Can you guess who said it? Hat tip goes to Felix Salmon.