Sentence to Ponder and Ponder and Ponder

Does any sentence better illustrate the human condition in all its political, social and biological complexities than this sentence?

New York state lawmakers have passed a bill banning residents from taking “tiger selfies” — a rising trend on dating websites in which single men post photos of themselves posing with the ferocious felines in hopes of impressing potential mates.

Dissertations are waiting to be written.

Comments

"Does any sentence better illustrate the human condition in all its political, social and biological complexities than this sentence?"

... yes?

the challenge is on to find the sentence

I'm going with this as better capturing all of those complexities:
"That's what she said."

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

"How good a climate change solution do we need?"

Comments for this post are closed

The sentence was self-referential.

Comments for this post are closed

It mostly illustrates the need for lawmakers to have full-time jobs doing something besides making laws.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Well, I would have thought that GMU's director of the Center for Study of Public Choice would have better ideas for dissertations than what was posted on this web site.

Not to mention the Bartley J. Madden Chair in Economics at the Mercatus Center. Though for different reasons, admittedly.

Seriously, p_a don't you have anything better to do? Aren't you bored of this game yet? We are.

I am not sure what the game is, actually. It seems more like some kind of odd compulsion.

It's definitely compulsive behavior.

+1, and fairly narcissistic too

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

It is a bot. If you watch long enough it repeats itself.

Comments for this post are closed

It could be a hobby. Some people collect stamps. Some people watch birds. Some people make eccentric comments on blog postings. Some people reply in a serious way to eccentric comments on blog postings.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I feel better about myself when I demolish weird people with weird comments on a website that talks about tiger pic regulations.

meta.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

It's a common touristy thing to do in Thailand.

I live in Thailand and now taking selfies with the Army is surpassing taking selfies with Tourists.

Omly tourists take selfies with tigers in Thailand...

Oh...that was...maybe...your point.

...And I typoed Land of Smiles.. *sigh*

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Isn't the illustrative part that there is interest in banning the selfies?

... and that the bar for dissertation topics is at its lowest point in human history?

Comments for this post are closed

Also the ban was proposed by a woman.

Aren't they all, really?

I have to say that's really funny.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

How about these sentences from Prof. Cowen:

"Tyler Cowen, economics professor at George Mason University, guards against demanding that every piece of work is paid. It can be 'corrupting if you get into the mindset that you only do things for money,' he says."

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/d74adaa2-f625-11e3-83d3-00144feabdc0.html#axzz35ZklMKZu

Comments for this post are closed

isn't there a free speech issue?

Comments for this post are closed

Oh, it's a doozy all right. Evolutionary Psychology is without question the single best predictor of human behaviour. But also, look at the divide between the state and the individual - I think Ev.Psych. tells us everything about econ. and politics too.

Evo-psych predicts nothing. It is a series of just-so stories.

So is the rest of evolution. It is still the single most powerful tool for understanding the biological world.

Unless, you know, you believe in Intelligent Design or something?

Do you have faith in human ability to differentiate between evolution by natural selection and neutral evolution?

Comments for this post are closed

Evolution is just a bunch of just-so stories? Ask a population geneticist or evolutionary biologist to explain what he or she does, and you'll see that evolutionary biology is based in theory, experimentation, and evidence just like any other investigative science.

The jury is still out on evo-psych but I think it will turn out to be a serious area of inquiry.

I'll believe in evo-psych when there's a human behaviour is *can't* explain. Until that point, it's utterly unfalsifiable.

(Sorry, but too many times I've simply seen E-P used to plausibly explain a micro-study that found behaviour A,and then used to plausibly explain a different micro-study that found behaviour not-A.

Its become clear that E-P satisfies our need for a good narrative - it *feels* right. But it does so because it's *so* fuzzy and has thousands of interfering variables, which allows us to build an explanation for everything.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

When I saw the preview, I thought the first sentence was referring to itself recursively.

Comments for this post are closed

These two sentences also appear in the linked news article:

“They can still pose with bears and monkeys,” the assemblywoman said. “They just have to take big cats off their list.”

First they came for the Big Cat selfies, and I remained silent - I only wanted a monkey selfie.

:-)

Yeah, I mean, as long as they don't ban Elephaselfies ...

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

A friend has had great success parodying this trend by posing with a Maine Coon.

Comments for this post are closed

"Does any sentence better illustrate the difference between a Tabarrok post and a Cowen post?"

Fixed.

Comments for this post are closed

In about 50% of these cases, the dude would be better off being eaten by the tiger . . .

Comments for this post are closed

Ignorant creationists strike again.

Comments for this post are closed

Waiting for the first First Amendment challenge, I guess.

It's plainly expressive speech, inane and pointless as it is, and the "compelling interest" in stopping such photographs is unclear; mere 'safety', as the alleged concern is, is untenable, given that the same speaker equally said bears are okay to pose with and touch.

(And of course, only "fairs and circuses" are covered. So wildlife parks or zoos? Or a private exotic animal being rented out? That's all different. Because "safety".)

What I see here is that the New York Assembly is, unsurprisingly, more concerned To Be Seen To Be Doing Something than anything else.

"inane and pointless as it is"

Well, there's your dissertation topic right there: comparing the response rate for men on dating websites using tiger selfie profile pics vs those with regular selfies. I predict a modest but still measurable positive effect.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Busybodies got to busybody.

Comments for this post are closed

the penalty is a $500 fine. will this increase or decrease the use of these pictures on dating sites.

I think the tiger should get to eat 1/100 of them to improve signal content.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

"Think of it as evolution in action." - Larry Niven

Nobody survives a selfie with a Kzin.

No but they will hang your skin up in a museum if you try really hard.

Which considering the fate of many tigers seems only fair.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

This raises equal protection issues if it also doesn't prohibit tigers from taking selfies with GMU’s director of the Center for Study of Public Choice and the Bartley J. Madden Chair in Economics at the Mercatus Center.

Comments for this post are closed

You can't use a tiger to bait a cougar?

Only if she's wearing tiger mom jeans.

Comments for this post are closed

You can’t use a tiger to bait a cougar? = winner!

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Tigers? Pah! I want to pick up biologists like Bernadette. So I take selfies next to Clostridium botulinum

Tigers are for wimps!

Comments for this post are closed

Why would men agree to compete in this way? Posing with tiger: cool. Handling rattlesnake: uncool.

Comments for this post are closed

Well then, I guess the cat cafés will have to move to Jersey.

Comments for this post are closed

The bill is aimed not at selfies, but the reckless practice of some animal exhibitors of having people interact or pose with the big cats in a very dangerous way. A long time ago I was bothered to see a theme park have children pose around a large tiger. Just ask Roy Horn what a tiger might suddenly do.

Consult the site below where the author of the bill states that she found out about Tiger selfies only after getting the bill passed.
http://www.cnet.com/news/ny-bill-bans-pics-with-big-cats-thats-you-tinder-tiger-selfies/

Also Alex:--do your homework rather than rush to post your next silly thing to prove your thesis that anything government does must be stupid.

Roy Horn was born in 1944? He was bitten in 2003?

So let's say he was training tigers for 40 years. Let's also assume a 40 hour week for 250 days a year. So 40,000 hours spent in the company of tigers. Plural. Armed with a whip and a chair.

He got bitten once.

I think we can agree that any one selfie is probably safe based on Roy's life.

Comments for this post are closed

I agree - I think the title is misleading and attention grabbing. I have to ask though, how does posing with bears seem any safer?

Seems much safer to me, just wear a condom if you take it beyond posing.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Deplorable practice (Vladimir Putin has much to answer for) but a vast improvement on shooting tigers and/or consuming their penii.

Sounds like somebody has never tasted tiger penis.

Well there's a comment you don't expect to see on MR. But I have to ask - was it Chinese cuisine or exotic sexual practices?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Not while the tiger lives, I confess.

Comments for this post are closed

"In one moment, he had both the lady and the tiger."

Comments for this post are closed

Moves to posing with a 16 ounce soda?

zing!

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Alex, can you change the "submit" button to something else, or at leasy mine? Maybe "conquer" "slay" or "gig 'em"?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed