Month: April 2009
a mutual fund which invests in the so-called "sin" industries like
distillers, casino operators and cigarette companies, has lost 42% over
the past twelve months. That's actually four percentage points worse
than the Standard & Poor's 500 index overall.
Meanwhile the Ave Maria suite of mutual funds, which invest only in
companies that comply with certain Roman Catholic values, have done
better. The Ave Maria Growth Fund is only down 33%. It's beaten Vice by
nine points and the S&P by five.
It's hardly a miracle — but maybe enough to raise eyebrows on Wall
Street, a secular place where the usual invocation is "let us prey."
More here. Hat tip to John Chilton.
Andrew Rose and Mark Spiegel report:
Economists are skeptical about the economic benefits of hosting
“mega-events” such as the Olympic Games or the World Cup, since such
activities have considerable cost and seem to yield few tangible
benefits. These doubts are rarely shared by policy-makers and the
population, who are typically quite enthusiastic about such spectacles.
In this paper, we reconcile these positions by examining the economic
impact of hosting mega-events like the Olympics; we focus on trade.
Using a variety of trade models, we show that hosting a mega-event like
the Olympics has a positive impact on national exports. This effect is
statistically robust, permanent, and large; trade is around 30% higher
for countries that have hosted the Olympics. Interestingly however, we
also find that unsuccessful bids to host the Olympics have a similar
positive impact on exports. We conclude that the Olympic effect on
trade is attributable to the signal a country sends when bidding to
host the games, rather than the act of actually holding a mega-event.
We develop a political economy model that formalizes this idea, and
derives the conditions under which a signal like this is used by
countries wishing to liberalize.
An ungated copy of the paper is to be found here (which, I should note, I have not read).
Could it be unobserved heterogeneity, namely that up-and-coming nations (and there is no perfect way to control for that) are the ones who apply to host the Olympics? It costs a lot of money to put together a bid and Albania is simply not going to try. It is hard for me to believe that unsuccessfully submitting a bid to host the Olympics should boost exports by 30%. The simpler model is that winner's curse holds, overbidding for the games results, bidding is also driven by rent-seeking and special interests, but since the bidders are up-and-coming cities in the final analysis the complaints don't sound so convincing.
This is from only one county, but I found these numbers (check out the table) instructive:
About 2 percent of the people charged with major violent crimes in
Prince William County last year were illegal immigrants, but they were
arrested for a larger portion of secondary offenses, according to newly
released statistics and a Washington Post analysis that offer the first
comprehensive look at criminal activity since the county implemented
its controversial anti-illegal immigration measures.
The crime of prostitution has the highest percentage of illegal immigrants as arrestees, namely 21.4 percent. If you are wondering, the new county procedure is to check the immigration status of everyone taken into custody. A few points:
1. Immigration has worked much better in northern Virginia than in many other parts of the country, most of all southern California. The number will not be this low in many other locales.
2. I don't have a number for the percentage of illegal immigrants in Prince William County, but I believe there are many, albeit a falling number.
3. I am not convinced by the argument that illegal immigrants will try "especially hard" not to get caught, because they are illegal immigrants and do not wish to be deported. This argument has been used to suggest that two percent is an underestimate.
4. When all is said and done, two percent is a fairly low number.
What and when was the deepest economic collapse in any non-communist, non-wartime, fully industrialized country since the 1930s?
First offer your guess in the comments. Then check the answer.
Masonomics looks at the human brain as an organ that is highly evolved
to engage in deception, including self-deception. It can reason without
necessarily being rational. The way I see it, Masonomics does not
necessarily agree that humans tend to choose the best ways to achieve
their objectives. Instead, we are limited by our capacity for
self-deception, among other shortcomings.
That is from Arnold Kling.
In a remarkable illustration of the power of lobbying in Washington, a study released last week found that a single tax break in 2004 earned companies $220 for every dollar they spent on the issue — a 22,000 percent rate of return on their investment.
The study by researchers at the University of Kansas underscores the central reason that lobbying has become a $3 billion-a-year industry in Washington: It pays. The $787 billion stimulus act and major spending proposals have ratcheted up the lobbying frenzy further this year, even as President Obama and public-interest groups press for sharper restrictions on the practice.
From the Washington Post. We will never get the money out of politics until we get the politics out of money.
Here's a piece from the WSJ on the latest intervention into the market for executive compensation:
…[The] government disclosed that it had set limits on executive pay for 2008 at state-owned financial companies, the latest effort to address public concern over pay at companies controlled by the country's nominally socialist government.
Total compensation for last year was capped at 90% of the amount executives received in 2007, the Ministry of Finance said in a brief statement. For companies whose revenue fell last year, the limit was set at 80%, it said. The statement, issued late Thursday, said the new rule had been issued "recently," but didn't elaborate. A ministry spokesman declined to comment Friday.
Need I tell you that the story is about the communist party and China? Sadly, I think I do need.
Hat tip to Helen Yang.
One sugar daddy whose screen name is Sam has tried long-term
girlfriends, mistresses, prostitutes and a brief marriage. Now single,
the 39-year-old entrepreneur has found the arrangement that suits him
best: a monogamous business-associate-with-benefits deal in which he
pursues an entrepreneurial project with a young, beautiful, intelligent
woman. He provides financial backing, mentoring and networking; she
provides sex, fun and, inevitably, a bit of worshiping, all of which
make him feel virile and influential. In between vacations using his
private jet, both work hard on the project. They don’t tend to see each
other much, as he travels frequently for his work.
I don't recall seeing that arrangement anywhere in Oliver Williamson's typology of the business firm. Should I have entitled this post "What people will spend on theatre"? Does this make it sound better?
Sam runs these relationships with an explicit business plan, a set
budget, measurable goals and quarterly reviews. From the outset, the
contract has an end date. It’s a brilliant, if contrived, way to
protect his pride. The contract specifies that the romance and sex are
to end by the preset date, so there’s no break up, no rejection, no
bruised ego. She’s not dumping him; the gig’s just over.
Here is the much longer story. Here is more:
He has an almost mathematical approach to assessing relationships, and
once even computed the costs for a girlfriend, mistress, prostitute and
wife – mistresses turn out to be most expensive by the hour; wives, by
the year; girlfriends are cheapest all around. But he’s not as
calculating as he seems. In fact, he concluded there’s little
correlation between cost and quality. Still, he is relentlessly
searching for an algorithm that will predict relationships’ success.
At North America's largest cell phone trade show, running this week in
Las Vegas, there were few new phones for the U.S. market that had a
numerical keypad instead of an alphabetic keyboard…
Old-fashioned numeric keypads
still will have a prominent place – but largely overseas. In a twist of
market dynamics, the demand for QWERTY phones is mainly a North
American phenomenon, said Ross Rubin, an analyst at NPD.
It's true QWERTY had a head start from the fact that we all learned it at a young age. Still, there is a starting over of sorts and if some alternative system were better for cell phone texting we might expect it to be evolving now. It isn't.
More information here.
1. Singer: Amalia Rodrigues, fado specialist. I am also a fan of Sara Tavares, especially this CD. Carmen Miranda is often thought of as Brazilian, but she was born in Portugal and I believe she grew up there as well. She was good.
2. Popular music: Nelly Furtado has Portuguese ancestry, although I believe most of the demons who inhabit the MR comments section would count her as Canadian.
3. Novelist: Jose Saramago. But I don't like them all. Blindness, The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis, and The Double are the primary ones to read. Baltasar and Blimunda I should try again. The Stone Raft is good. Currently I am reading, and enjoying Antunes's Fado Alexandrino.
4. Philosopher: Can I count Spinoza?
5. Painter: I guess I pick Paula Rego. I can't think of a classic painter here.
6. Poet and essayist: Pessoa. I've been influenced by his work. The Book of Disquiet is his masterpiece.
7. Composer: Manuel Cardoso is the only one I can think of. He's OK.
8. Former colony: Brazil. But there's stiff competition.
9. Economist, one eighth of him: Can you guess? The eighth is from the Madeira Islands with the family name Alfonso.
The bottom line: I am worried by the gaps here, including classical music, cinema, painting, and sculpture. Yet #8 makes up for it all. I suspect that too much royal patronage is the reason why there are so many notable Portuguese explorers and so few recognized composers.
Here is an excellent blog post and Fed study. There is too much content for my summary to dominate clicking on the link but the bottom line is this:
This analysis suggests mortgage modifications – without principal reduction – will have limited success.
It is one of the best economics blog posts this week.
Remember the good old days, when economists used to write papers about how firms — most of all public utilities — would under-report profits, to minimize regulation and control? These days we have firms over-reporting profits to minimize regulation and control.
(As an aside, Wells Fargo was the most responsible of the major banks, so we shouldn't regard the profit report as a complete lie or illusion.)
We also have economists saying that banks should essentially be turned into public utilities.
And the major regulator is saying the firms shouldn't be reporting so much at all.
Times indeed have changed.