Category: Web/Tech

Assorted links

1. A good point: "The central failure of these interviews, like so many, is that they operate from the proposition, "what would my readers find interesting?" instead of "what does my subject find interesting?"

2. Reason to worry about the second half of next year.

3. The Japanese sex-breakfast-mother-appreciation correlations.

4. How Victoria's Secret modifies a photo (excellent link, safe for work).

5. Photo sequences which are truly and deeply baffling to me.  And here is Tavi Gevinson, 13-year-old fashion maven.  

6. The evolution of empires; 1960 is the highlight.

7. Palindromic date puzzle.

Assorted links

1. Recent work in Austrian economics.

2. 121-hour long lecture (with breaks), the longest ever?

3. Scott Sumner on movies, great post.

4. Is it possible that 225,000 Haitian children are slaves?  Read this too: "Researchers said the practice of young servants, known as 'restavek', is so common that almost half of 257 children interviewed in the shantytown of Cite Soleil were household slaves. The report found that most of the children are sent by parents, who cannot afford to care for them, to families just slightly better off."

5. More on the psychology of menu pricing.

6. Peter Singer and Bill Easterly on Bloggingheads.TV.

What does programmer productivity look like?

I am unable to judge the details of its contents, but this article intrigued me.  The key question is why pay across highly-talented and lesser-talented programmers isn't more unequal.  (That's a question I'd like economists to study more generally, given the disparities in productivity across individuals within a firm.)  Here is an excerpt:

Software output cannot be measured as easily as dollars or bricks. The best programmers do not write 10x as many lines of code and they certainly do not work 10x longer hours.

Programmers are most effective when they avoid writing code. They may realize the problem they’re being asked to solve doesn’t need to be solved, that the client doesn’t actually want what they’re asking for. They may know where to find reusable or re-editable code that solves their problem. They may cheat. But just when they are being their most productive, nobody says “Wow! You were just 100x more productive than if you’d done this the hard way. You deserve a raise.” At best they say “Good idea!” and go on.  It may take a while to realize that someone routinely comes up with such time-saving insights. Or to put it negatively, it may take a long time to realize that others are programming with sound and fury but producing nothing.

For the pointer I thank Hamilton Ulmer.

Assorted links

1. Britain will give up on paper bank cheques [checks] altogether.

2. The new Hayao Miyazaki project.

3. The charcuterie resistance.

4. The constitutional crisis in Nigeria.

5. Betting markets in everything: Tiger and Elin's divorce settlement, plus who will sponsor Tiger next.

6. The Paul Samuelson Memorial investment tax credit.

7. Umbrellas of altruism: pay a premium and get them blunt.

Assorted links

1. Gelman criticizes Levitt on drunk driving; Jeff Ely chimes in here.

2. A new method for measuring earthquakes, tweets per minute.

3. Political souvenirs, from Italy.

4. Wavvves is my favorite popular music album this year, except it isn't popular.

5. Germans are happier if they earn less than their neighbors.

6. Peter Thiel's favorite thinker is Rene Girard.

7. Yegor Gaidar passes away at 53.

8. Policy communicators essay contest for $15,000.