Assorted links
1. Geographic map of Dutch first names; more interesting than you might think.
2. Bob Cottrell's favorite research paper.
3. The culture that is Japan, robot officiates wedding and here.
Questions that are rarely asked
If you could create a punctuation mark, what would its function be and what would it look like?
That's from Hudson Collins, loyal MR reader. I've always liked the chess marks "!?" and "?!" and wondered why they weren't used in standard English. The former refers to a startling move which is uncertain in merit and the latter refers to a dubious move which creates difficult to handle complications. Plus "N" could be used to mark sentences with novel ideas. I also would ask for a punctuation mark meaning: "This sentence adds an "N+1" understanding to a problem which everyone else is discussing at an "N" level." Maybe the mark could be an arrow pointing up to the sky. Similarly, you could imagine an arrow pointing downwards to hell.
What kind of punctuation mark would you add?
Social welfare expenditures in the United States and the Nordic Countries
Price Fishback has a new paper and perhaps this abstract should be screamed from the yttertak:
The extent of social expenditures in the U.S. and the Nordic Countries is compared in the early 1900s and again in the early 2000s. The common view that America spends much less on social welfare than the Nordic countries does not survive closer inspection when we consider the differences in the structures of social expenditures. The standard comparison examines gross social expenditures. After adjustments for direct and indirect taxes paid, the net social expenditures in the Nordic countries are much closer to American levels. Inclusion of mandatory and private social expenditures raises the American share of GDP devoted to social expenditures to rank among the middle of the Nordic countries. Per capita net public social expenditures in the U.S. rank behind only Sweden. Add in the private spending, and per capita spending in the U.S. is higher than in all of the Nordic countries. Finally, I document the enormous diversity across time and place in public social expenditures in the U.S. in the early 1900s and circa 1990.
Fishback does discuss how, in line with intuition, the U.S. system is more porous and less universal. He also stresses how common it is that people do not claim or apply for benefits for which they are eligible.
Here are some of Fishback's papers on-line, but I do not see an ungated copy of this one.
Markets in Everything: Crop Insurance
Crop insurance for marijuana.
Here is a related question. How long do you predict it will be from legalization to government subsidization?
Hat tip: Ray Lehmann.
Theories of transparency cross the Atlantic
The European Central Bank disclosed Monday that it had bought 16.5 billion euros in bonds in the first week since taking the unprecedented step of intervening in markets to halt a sell-off of Greek and other European debt.
The bank did not say which countries’ debt it was buying, how much it would spend in the future, or whether it bought any corporate bonds. The 16.5 billion euros ($21 billion) was considered a relatively small amount for the market.
Analysts said the bank would want to keep investors guessing to maximize the psychological impact of the move.
If you paw through the article, you'll see they restored the scary Trichet quotation about markets having started to shut down last week.
Industrial Organization on YouTube bleg
I am teaching IO next fall and would like to use some lectures on YouTube. The class is at the Ph.d. level but a good intuitive talk would be fine, I'm not expecting all of these talks to be directed at the Ph.d. level per se. Would you all have recommendations?
By the way, here is my Google talk on prizes as incentives.
Middle East peace proposals
This one is new to me:
An even more radical idea has been put forward by Swedish diplomat Mathias Mossberg and UC-Irvine professor Mark LeVine. They do not believe giving settlers Palestinian passports would solve anything. The two propose creating overlapping states between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea, delinking the concept of state sovereignty from a specific territory. There would be an Israel and a Palestine, but rather than divide the land, the two states would be superimposed on top of one another. The plan would permit individuals to live where they wish and choose their political allegiance. This, they argue, would resolve the seemingly intractable questions of how to divide the holy city of Jerusalem and whether to allow Palestinian refugees “the right of return” to their old communities.
This doesn't seem practicable to me (no good mechanism for dispute resolution), but maybe in some other geopolitical setting it could be made to work,
Assorted links
4. Ross Douthat on where we have ended up.
5. Russ Roberts podcast on the financial crisis.
6. How does the Euro mess affect China? A good but scary article.
Oil Spills, Tort Law and Libertarianism
Here is Paul Krugman's Nth reason why libertarianism doesn't work:
Thinking about BP and the Gulf: in this old interview,
Milton Friedman says that there’s no need for product safety
regulation, because corporations know that if they do harm they’ll be
sued.Interviewer: So tort law takes care of a lot of this ..
Friedman: Absolutely, absolutely.
Meanwhile, in the real world:
In the wake of last month’s catastrophic Gulf Coast oil
spill, Sen. Lisa Murkowski blocked a bill that would have raised the
maximum liability for oil companies after a spill from a paltry $75
million to $10 billion. The Republican lawmaker said the bill,
introduced by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ), would have unfairly hurt
smaller oil companies by raising the costs of oil production. The
legislation is “not where we need to be right now” she said.And don’t say that we just need better politicians. If
libertarianism requires incorruptible politicians to work, it’s not
serious.
In other words, libertarianism can't work because government sucks. I am tempted to comment further on this creative line of reasoning but that is unnecessary since Paul has misunderstood the facts of the matter.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), which is the law that caps liability for economic damages at $75 million, does not override state law or common law remedies in tort (click on the link and search for common law or see here). Thus, Milton Friedman's preferred remedy for corporate negligence, tort law, continues to operate and there is no doubt that BPs potential liability under common law alone would be in the billions of dollars.
Thus, Paul now has only (N-1) reasons why libertarianism doesn't work.
Moreover, Paul has actually been too unkind to government, a defect it falls upon me (!) to correct. The point of the OPA was not to limit tort law but to supplement it.
Tort law, as traditionally understood, could only be used to recover damages to people and property rather than force firms to pay cleanup costs per se. Thus, in the OPA as I read it–and take the details with a grain of salt since I'm not a lawyer–there is no limit on cleanup costs. Moreover, the OPA makes the offender strictly liable for cleanup costs which means that if these costs are proven the offender must pay them regardless (there are a few defenses, such as an act of war, but they are unlikely to apply). The offender is also strictly liable for up to $75 million in economic damages above and beyond cleanup costs. Thus the $75 million is simply a cap on the strictly liable damages, the damages that if proven BP has to pay regardless. But there is no limit, even under the OPA, on economic damages in the event that BP failed to follow regulations or is otherwise shown to be negligent (same as under common law).
Sentences to ponder
Turkey can afford to keep tax rates unchanged “for the foreseeable future” while other European governments struggle to repair the damage done by the financial crisis, Ali Babacan, economy minister, said on Wednesday.
His comments reflect Turkey’s pride in weathering last year’s turmoil without bailing out any banks or seeking help from the International Monetary Fund. In contrast with much of the European Union it aspires to join, Turkey won recent upgrades to ratings of its sovereign debt after setting medium term fiscal targets it is likely to beat in 2010.
They're also not planning on raising the VAT and the debt-gdp ratio is about 45 percent, an enviable level for many EU nations. For a while now I've thought that Turkey should refuse membership in the EU, on the off chance that it ever were offered to them. Here is the full article.
Buried scary ledes
The [ECB] bank reversed itself on buying bonds amid signs that the debt crisis was spreading to the banking system.
“The situation was already starting to get worse on Thursday afternoon and throughout Friday of the week before last,” Mr. Trichet said. “A number of markets were no longer functioning correctly. It looked somewhat like the situation in mid-September 2008 after the Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy.”
I suppose…I am glad they have not screamed that from the rooftops. The full story is here.
Update: The scary lede has been removed altogether from any NYT story.
What makes an economist?
When you read about a shortage of women's restrooms, your first thought is whether there is some way of charging for usage.
As it stands, Congress is preparing a bill to regulate the ratio of men's to women's rooms in federal facilities. I would think the theatre and symphony orchestra is where reform is needed, not at the Treasury Department. Men might benefit too ("husband leaving" and "wife leaving" are often complements) and I wonder why Tiebout competition has not enforced better outcomes.
Assorted links
1. Will computers ever fully solve chess?, from Ken Regan.
2. Do inequality and slavery matter for later Brazilian outcomes?
3. Increasingly, I think meals like this are B.S. Two years ago I ate at Noma, now labeled "the best restaurant in the world" and I barely enjoyed it.
4. Is Bill Simmons my favorite writer these days? How many journalists or for that matter social scientists are as consistently smart and insightful? Why can't they be?
5. Should we judge Supreme Court Justices (and nominees) by their taste in art?
*Liberated Cooking*
I've been browsing this 1987 book, edited by Marty Zupan and Lou Villadsen, of recipes from libertarians and classical liberals. Nobel Laureate James M. Buchanan offers up his take on Middle Tennessee Fried Corn, claiming "Properly done, this is the best dish in the world!"
Select several ears of fresh field corn (not sweet corn), preferably Hickory King white corn. Husk ears, then cut tips of kernels into bowl. Then scrape remaining milk of kernels into bowl.
Add water and salt to mixture. Add 2 tbsp. lard (or other fat) to mixture.
Put in skillet and cook over moderate heat (simmer) for one hour. Add water as needed. Stir to prevent sticking.
You'll also find recipes from Robert Heinlein, Murray Rothbard (he claims his favorite dessert of Cherry Clafouti violates the otherwise praxeological law of diminishing marginal utility), two from David Friedman (medieval and Icelandic), Buchanan's pizza recipe, Ron Paul, David Henderson, Henry Hazlitt, and last but not least Milton Friedman's account of the stuffed cabbage which Rose cooked for him, inspired by her mother Sarah Director. Buchanan's is the only one which sounded tasty to me, possibly the Friedman recipe also.
What I’ve been reading
1. Ukraine & Russia: A Fraternal Rivalry, by Anatol Lieven. I didn't think I needed to read a dated book on Russian-Ukrainian relations, but in fact I did. This has excellent detail and conceptual analysis on every page. Recommended.
2. Neurodiversity: Discovering the Extraordinary Gifts of Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia, and Other Brain Differences, by Thomas Armstrong. I don't agree with all the details in this book, but so far it is the major popular statement of the position outlined by its title.
3. William Vollmann, Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater, with Some Thoughts on Muses (Especially Helga Testorf), Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Hou. What can one say about Vollmann at this point? The title is descriptive, for sure, and the author loves his topic. He's massively flawed to read but still more alive than most writers. Here are earlier MR posts on Vollmann, who issues large and deeply informed tomes at the rate I produce blog posts.
4. Kai Bird, Crossing Mandelbaum Gate: Coming of Age Between the Arabs and Israelis, 1956-1978. This is a fascinating portrait of the mid-century Arab world, a story of a itinerant childhood, plus it's an account of festering Mideast conflicts, a political Bildungsroman, and, every now and then, a story of what it's like to be an Israel skeptic and also be married to a woman whose parents are Holocaust survivors. Intelligent on every page.
5. Frank Trentmann, Free Trade Nation. The rise and decline of free trade ideology in Britain, told in scholarly yet exciting fashion. I am just starting this one.