The economics of magazines, and their economists

Arnold Kling criticizes National Review magazine, but don’t bother working through the argument.  It will only make your head hurt.  Perhaps you have read Brad DeLong on NR as well.  Arnold suggests that:

NRO clean out its stable of economics writers and instead choose from some of the other bloggers around. James Hamilton or Andrew Samwick or Russ Roberts or Don Boudreaux or Tyler Cowen or Alex Tabarrok.

I have not been reading NR, so I will not offer an independent assesssment.  But consider the basic economics.  Most popular political magazines live and die by direct mail.  The "burn rate" of non-renewals is very high, and either advertisers or donors will care about subscription numbers.  So new subscribers must be found frequently (NB: the real culprit is lack of loyalty of previous subscribers).  Given their natural constituencies, that makes it hard for a right-wing magazine to come out against George Bush.  The tendency is toward boosterism and taking sides.  That is one reason why I — a "small l" libertarian who preferred the economic policies of the Clinton years — am unlikely to receive some particular writing assignments.

On average "out of power" magazines (Reason, American Prospect) should be better than "in power" magazines.  But if NR, or NRO, wants a piece on how the Bush years have eaten into our economic, political, and institutional capital, I would be happy to oblige.

Headlines to make me laugh

"Fairfax Maps Tourist Gems"

Fairfax County rolled out a new slogan yesterday — "FX Marks the Spot" — designed to help tourists discover its "buried treasures" of historic sites, museums, art centers and other destinations.

The soon-to-be ubiquitous brand — a play on pirates’ tradition of drawing an X on their maps to indicate stashed gold — is the centerpiece of an unprecedented $1 million campaign, presented to the County Board of Supervisors, to promote Fairfax as a tourist attraction.

The emphasis should be on "buried."  Very buried.  Here is the story, and yes this will involve them spending the money I cough up for property taxes.

Russian admiral named patron saint of nuclear bomber arsenal

Historic Russian admiral Fyodor Ushakov — a hero of Russia’s wars against Turkey and Napoleon Bonaparte — was designated the patron saint of nuclear-armed, long-distance Russian bombers by the Orthodox Church…

"I am sure he will become your intermediary as you fulfil your responsible duties to the fatherland in the long-range air force," the patriarch said.

"His strong faith helped Saint Fyodor Ushakov in all his battles," the religious leader said, reminding his audience that the famous admiral of the 18th and 19th centuries never lost a battle.

Check out the photo.  Thanks to Dave Wells and Yana for the pointer.

The car alarm just went off

Want to get off the phone?  Buy these sound effects.  There are many good options, such as "Deposit 25 Cents" or "I Can’t Hear You (Helicopter Noise)".  But I don’t think "This fly is bothering me" will do the trick.  There is also a new section for responding to telemarketers, how about "I am Listening"?

Here is the link, and thanks to Joseph Weisenthal for the pointer.

New history of economic thought blog

What could be a better name than AdamSmithLives?  The writer is Sandra Peart, professor of economics at Baldwin-Wallace College and sometimes visitor at George Mason.  My colleague David Levy will be guilted into contributing as well.  Here is a post on exaggerated reporting about New Orleans, and its parallels in the history of economic thought.  Here is the mission statement.  Welcome to the blogosphere!

More Nobel Prize ideas

1. Nobel prize in environmental economics to Weitzman, Nordhaus

2. Nobel prize in trade theory to Bhagwatti and Dixit

3. Nobel prize in President Bush praising to Krugman and David Brooks

4. Nobel prize in behavioral stuff to Richard Thaler

5. Nobel prize in contracts to Hart, Holmstrom, and Oliver Williamson

6. Nobel prize in development economics to Dasgupta and Deaton

7. Nobel prize in finance to Fama

8. Nobel Price in mechanism design to Milgrom, Myerson and Maskin

9. Nobel prize in family economics to Mincer and Pollak

10. Prize in Political Economy to Alesina, Persson and Tabellini

11. Prize in Modern Macro to Barro and Sargent

More sexual Giffen goods

These demand curves are the exception rather than the rule, but nonetheless they appear to exist:

One sex worker…explained why she no longer offered her favorite clients free sex or cheaper rates: "They pretend to be flattered, but they never come back!…There was one client I had who was so sexy, a tai-chi practitioner, and really fun to ****.  Since good sex is a rare thing, I told him I’d see him for $20 (my normal rate is $250).  Another guy, he was so sexy, I told him "**** for free."  Both of them freaked out and never returned…They don’t believe they can have no-strings-attached sex, which is why they pay.  They’d rather pay than get it for free."

That is from The Purchase of Intimacy, by Viviana Zelizer.  I take the main point of this book to be yes you can love your prostitute and perhaps you can like your maid as well.  A commercial transaction is compatible with holding deeper feelings for the other party.

Here is a Richard Epstein review of the book.  I liked the book, but it is sad that the current debate needs such a tract.  Here is my previous post on Giffen goods.

My macro class has been asking me what kind of exam they can expect

Try this question:

"Simon Grant and John Quiggin argue that taking the equity premium seriously–-the well-known fact that the average annual historical return of stocks is seven times that of government bonds and other debt-–has many implications, the most robust of which is that recessions are extremely costly even if they don’t lower average consumption and that macroeconomic stabilization policies are more important than has been thought."

True or false, and why?  Under what conditions is your answer wrong (always the proper query)?  Here is a relevant link, though registration is required.

Opportunity cost

Visits to hospital emergency rooms in Boston plummeted during the city’s most nail-biting sports moments, according to a group of local doctors.

The team found that visits went down to as little as 80% of the average for the key Boston Red Sox games that attracted the most TV viewers. But ER visits rose above the average for games that had fewer viewers.

Is it safer to be watching TV, or do people with emergencies simply wait?  Here is the link.

What happened to the Orange Revolution?

Remember the democratization of the Ukraine?  Anders Aslund offers a sorry update:

For the past eight months…Ukraine’s economic policy has been nothing short of disastrous. Economic growth has plummeted from an annual 12 per cent last year to 2.8 per cent so far this year, driven by a fall in ­investment.

The blame for this startling deterioration must lie with the government’s economic policies. By agitating for widespread nationalisation and renewed sales of privatised companies, the government undermined property rights. In addition, it raised the tax burden sharply to finance huge increases in welfare spending and public wages. Very publicly, Ms Tymoshenko interfered in pricing and property disputes, criticising individual businessmen. Chaos and uncertainty prevailed. This populist policy had little in common with the electoral promises of Viktor Yushchenko, the president, about liberal market reforms.

There is much more, read the whole thing.

New Brazilian economics blog

Portuguese is my favorite language to hear sung.  I cannot read it, but here is a new Brazilian economics blog, degustibusblog.net.  At the very least I know the authors like me.  If you insist on something Brazilian in English, do not forget Eduardo Giannetti’s much underrated The Lies We Live By: The Art of Self-Deception.  Heading back to Portuguese, here is a classical liberal site, thanks to Tom Palmer for the pointer.