Category: Science
Are there advantages to prosopagnosia?
The artist Chuck Close, who is famous for his gigantic portraits of faces, has severe, lifelong prosopagnosia. He believes it has played a crucial role in driving his unique artistic vision. "I don't know who anyone is and essentially have no memory at all for people in real space," he says. "But when I flatten them out in a photograph I can commit that image to memory."
That is from a recent NY article by Oliver Sacks, not on-line but gated here. Sacks himself has this condition, as did Jane Goodall, including when she worked with chimpanzees.
Lester D.: “Science you never knew you needed”
He is possibly Vaughn Bell's favorite psychologist. Bell links to this blog post:
For example, Lester D. has discovered that:
Mormons view the afterlife as less pleasant than Jews.
On average, there is no difference in the height from which men and women jump to their deaths.
Wives of coast guards and no more likely than wives of firemen to be depressed following a family move, but are more likely to be taking antidepressants.
There is no relation between religiosity and death anxiety in Kuwait.
Both anxiety about computers and internet skills affect how likely you are to buy a textbook online.
Among organ donors, homicide victims were more likely to have blood types O and B. Suicides showed no differences.
Macintosh users have significantly greater anxiety about computers than PC users.
Here is the explanation:
When searching for psychology research, I inevitably come across a study by ‘Lester D’, who is apparently a psychologist in an obscure college in New Jersey who seems to be interested in everything.
Mostly, the things you’ve never thought of, and probably never even thought of thinking of, and perhaps don’t even have the capacity to conceptualise.
To be fair, he has a clear interest in suicide research and does a great deal of important work in this, and other areas, but what consistently amazes me are the diverse topics he investigates.
Why isn’t this on Robin Hanson’s blog?
Older people like reading negative news stories about their younger counterparts because it boosts their own self-esteem, according to a new study.
Or on Bryan Caplan's blog, for that matter? Here is more and I thank Daniel Lippmann for the pointer. The underlying data, by the way, are taken from Germany.
Lomborg vs. Lomborg
The world's most high-profile climate change sceptic is to declare that global warming is "undoubtedly one of the chief concerns facing the world today" and "a challenge humanity must confront", in an apparent U-turn that will give a huge boost to the embattled environmental lobby.
…But in a new book to be published next month, Lomborg will call for tens of billions of dollars a year to be invested in tackling climate change. "Investing $100bn annually would mean that we could essentially resolve the climate change problem by the end of this century," the book concludes.
…In an interview with the Guardian, he said he would finance this investment through a tax on carbon emissions that would also raise $50bn to mitigate the effects of climate change, for example by building better sea defences, and $100bn for global healthcare.
The full story is here.
Are TV ads more effective if we pay less attention to them?
I consider this a speculative result but it is interesting nonetheless:
"There has been a lot of research which shows that creative TV ads are more effective than those which simply deliver information, and it has always been assumed that it is because viewers pay more attention to them.
"But in a relaxed situation like TV watching, attention tends to be used mainly as a defence mechanism. If an ad bombards us with new information, our natural response is to pay attention so we can counter-argue what it is telling us. On the other hand, if we feel we like and enjoy an ad, we tend to be more trustful of it and therefore we don't feel we need to pay too much attention to it.
"The sting in the tail is that by paying less attention, we are less able to counter-argue what the ad is communicating. In effect we let our guard down and leave ourselves more open to the advertiser's message.
"This has serious implications for certain categories of ads, particularly ads for products that can be harmful to our health, and products aimed at children.
"The findings suggest that if you don't want an ad to affect you in this way, you should watch it more closely."
Andrew Wiles and Fermat’s Last Theorem
Here is one of my all time favorite documentaries, the 45 minute Fermat's Last Theorem made by Simon Singh and John Lynch for the BBC in 1996. I've watched it many times and every time I am moved by unforgettable moments.
The plainspoken Goro Shimura talking of his friend Yutaka Taniyama, "he was not a very careful person as a mathematician, he made a lot of mistakes but he made mistakes in a good direction." "I tried to imitate him," he says sadly, "but I found out that it is very difficult to make good mistakes." Shimura continues to be troubled by his friend's suicide in 1958.
And then there is Andrew Wiles, the frail knight who for seven lonely years pursues the proof that has ensorcelled him since childhood. He announces the proof to the world, is featured on the front page of the New York Times and in People Magazine, he has the respect and admiration of his colleagues and then he discovers the proof is wrong. He works another year trying to fix it but every time he patches one area another fault line opens up. Even speaking of it now you can see and hear his utter despair. It is not too much to imagine that he was on the verge of a breakdown. Unforgettable.
Hat tip to Kottke.
The supply curve slopes upward
For background, Cyprus allows commercialization of the practice and many European nations do not:
According to a 2010 study by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, nearly 25,000 egg donations are performed in Europe for fertility tourists every year. More than 50% of those surveyed traveled abroad in order to circumvent legal regulations at home. The Cypriot government estimates that, each year, 1 in 50 women on the island between the ages of 18 and 30 sells her eggs. One NGO analyst says that among the island's Eastern European immigrants, the rate may reach 1 in 4, and some women give up their eggs several times in a year. By comparison, only 1 of every 14,000 eligible American women donates.
Here is the full story, the article is interesting throughout. Can you guess which women face the highest demand for their eggs? I thank Alex Mann for the pointer.
Will there be a helium crisis?
Is it possible that the relative price of helium will rise in nearly unprecedented fashion? Robert Richardson voices his opinion:
[The US government should] Get out of the business and let the free market prevail. The consequence will be a rise in prices. Unfortunately party balloons will be $100 each rather than $3 but we'll have to live with that. We will have to live with those prices eventually anyway.
He notes:
There is no chemical means to make helium. The supplies we have on Earth come from radioactive alpha decay in rocks. Right now it's not commercially viable to recover helium from the air, so we have to rely on extracting it from rocks. But if we do run out altogether, we will have to recover helium from the air and it will cost 10,000 times what it does today.
Yet helium is the second most abundant element in the universe and it accounts for 24% of the mass of our galaxy, according to Wikipedia. The marginal cost curve stands between plenty and scarcity.
We also use helium in machines designed to detect radioactivity. Right now the government is committed to selling off its strategic reserve of helium, located near Amarillo, Texas, by 2015. Here is a dialog on helium extraction. Here is a dialog on the forthcoming helium crisis. Here is another short article. Here is a book chapter on the helium reserve. Richardson claims the helium crisis will arrive in twenty-five years' time.
*Packing for Mars*
Dust is the lunar astronaut’s nemesis. With no water or wind to smooth them, the tiny, hard moon rock particles remain sharp. They scratched faceplates and camera lenses during Apollo, destroyed bearings, clogged equipment joints. Dusting on the moon is a fool’s errand. Unlike on the Earth, where the planet’s magnetic field wards off charged particles of solar wind, these particles bombard the moon’s surface and impart an electrostatic charge. Moon dust clings like dryer socks. Astronauts who stepped from the Lunar Module in gleaming white marshamllow suits returned a few hours later looking like miners. The Apollo 12 suits and long johns became so filthy that at one point, astronaut Jim Lovell told me, the crew “took off all their underwear and they were naked for half the way home.”
That is from Mary Roach’s new book, subtitled The Curious Science of Life in the Void.
Robert Sloss predicted the iPhone in 1910
Well, more or less. Or is it an iPad? In 1910 Stoss published an essay called "The Wireless Century," intending to predict the world of 2010. In this world everyone carries around a "wireless telegraph" which:
1. Serves as a telephone, the whole world over.
2. Either rings or vibrates in your pocket.
3. Can transmit any musical recording or performance with perfect clarity.
4. Can allow people to send each other photographs, across the entire world.
5. Can allow people to see the images of paintings, museums, etc. in distant locales.
6. No one will ever be alone again.
7. Can serve as a means of payment, connecting people to their bank accounts and enabling payments (Japan is ahead of us here).
8. Can connect people to all newspapers, although Sloss predicted that people would prefer that the device read the paper aloud to them (not so much the case).
9. Can transmit documents to "thin tubes of ink," which will then print those documents in distant locales.
10. People will have a better sense of the poor, and of suffering, because they will have witnessed it through their device (not obviously true, at least not yet).
11. People will vote using their devices and this will empower democracy (nope).
12. Judicial testimonies will be performed over such devices, often from great distances.
13. People will order perfectly-fitting fashions from Paris; this guy should be in the Apps business.
14. Married couples will be much closer, and distance relationships will be closer and better.
15. Military targeting and military orders will become extremely precise.
The essay is reprinted in the Arthur Brehmer book Die Welt in 100 Jahren. The book is interesting throughout; a bunch of the other writers thought in 2010 we would be fighting wars with large zeppelins.
P = NP?
Here is one discussion of how hard it is to find the betting market in this proposition. Here is a betting market of unclear size and relevance, on which Millennium math problem will be solved next; it apparently predicts 76 percent for P vs. Np.
Here is an overview of where the entire debate is at, in Wiki form.
All of the pointers are from the ever-curious Chris F. Masse.
Spontaneous order on the road
Here’s a video of a small town in Britain that turned its traffic lights off. Order ensued.
The experiment is not unique. Tom Vanderbilt wrote an excellent piece in The Wilson Quarterly a few years ago on traffic revolutionary Hans Monderman (see also this NYTimes piece) who has redesigned a number of city centers:
At the town center, in a crowded four-way intersection called the Laweiplein, Monderman removed not only the traffic lights but virtually every other traffic control. Instead of a space cluttered with poles, lights, “traffic islands,” and restrictive arrows, Monderman installed a radical kind of roundabout (a “squareabout,” in his words, because it really seemed more a town square than a traditional roundabout), marked only by a raised circle of grass in the middle, several fountains, and some very discreet indicators of the direction of traffic, which were required by law.
As I watched the intricate social ballet that occurred as cars and bikes slowed to enter the circle (pedestrians were meant to cross at crosswalks placed a bit before the intersection), Monderman performed a favorite trick. He walked, backward and with eyes closed, into the Laweiplein. The traffic made its way around him. No one honked, he wasn’t struck. Instead of a binary, mechanistic process–stop, go–the movement of traffic and pedestrians in the circle felt human and organic.
A year after the change, the results of this “extreme makeover” were striking: Not only had congestion decreased in the intersection–buses spent less time waiting to get through, for example–but there were half as many accidents, even though total car traffic was up by a third.
The experiments are interesting in their own right but they are also very good illustrations of spontaneous order; how order is possible without orders.
Hat tip: Dan Klein.
Good sentences about Japan
In Japan, psychologists evaluate astronaut candidates by, among other things, their ability to fold origami cranes swiftly under stress.
Here is more. The review has at least one other good sentence.
Is there a genetic component to varying degrees of cooperativeness?
I have thought about this question and now I see a new paper (ungated here) on the topic:
Genes and culture are often thought of as opposite ends of the nature–nurture spectrum, but here we examine possible interactions. Genetic association studies suggest that variation within the genes of central neurotransmitter systems, particularly the serotonin (5-HTTLPR, MAOA-uVNTR) and opioid (OPRM1 A118G), are associated with individual differences in social sensitivity, which reflects the degree of emotional responsivity to social events and experiences. Here, we review recent work that has demonstrated a robust cross-national correlation between the relative frequency of variants in these genes and the relative degree of individualism–collectivism in each population, suggesting that collectivism may have developed and persisted in populations with a high proportion of putative social sensitivity alleles because it was more compatible with such groups. Consistent with this notion, there was a correlation between the relative proportion of these alleles and lifetime prevalence of major depression across nations. The relationship between allele frequency and depression was partially mediated by individualism–collectivism, suggesting that reduced levels of depression in populations with a high proportion of social sensitivity alleles is due to greater collectivism. These results indicate that genetic variation may interact with ecological and social factors to influence psychocultural differences.
Still, I can't see the evidence. I don't see the case for causation. Let's say something about a group's serotonin level made it more susceptible to social stress: couldn't that lead to either greater individualism or greater collectivism? Is collectivism so calming and are social institutions so functional so as to respond to how stressed we feel from social interactions? If I were a very stressed out person (I'm not), wouldn't I prefer to live in or construct the social institutions of Sweden, which in this context counts as individualistic?
You might respond that the evolving alleles should be linked to earlier Swedish society and not Sweden today. But then one needs to measure collectivism vs. individualism at that earlier point in time. I wouldn't be surprised if China in the tenth century were "more individualistic" than Sweden in the age of the Vikings, and so on.
(By the way, Is "individualism vs. collectivism" the right spectrum? We individualistic Americans seem especially apt at being trained to kill people and fire when ordered. We also seem especially patriotic.)
If you pull out the strangely-placed Colombia from Figure 1 in the paper, it's basically a Europeans vs. Asians effect driving both the genetic contrasts and the collectivism vs. individualism contrasts. We're left with two quite general contrasts and no theory connecting the two or much of a good reason to think they should be connected.
Don't we just have two data points here — "Asia" and "Europe" — and the split of the data into countries is a phony way to boost apparent statistical significance?
It's a broader question what effects higher serotonin levels have. I've tried to read a few papers on this topic and I've seen high serotonin levels correlated with both anxiety and calm. To be sure, this may reflect the inability of this non-specialist to see through to the best and best understood results, but still the relevance of serotonin to human behavior hardly seems like an open and shut question. I'd sooner suggest that right now we don't understand serotonin very well, at least not as it shapes broader social interactions.
I thank RR for the relevant pointer.
The strangest headline I read today
Monkeys hate flying squirrels, report monkey-annoyance experts
Yet the subheader is arguably yet stranger:
Japanese macaques will completely flip out when presented with flying squirrels, a new study in monkey-antagonism has found. The research could pave the way for advanced methods of enraging monkeys.
That is from the Christian Science Monitor. Hat tip goes to Andrew Sullivan.