Scott Alexander on chips (from the comments)
Those new service sector jobs, LDS edition
Bob Sagers was walking around an indie music festival in Salt Lake City when a friendly stranger approached and asked for his number.
“Has anyone ever told you that you have a Jesus look to you?” the man asked, according to Sagers, a 25-year-old who works as a cheesemonger at a grocery store. It wasn’t a pickup line—the man’s wife was an artist looking for religious models.
“I didn’t really get that a lot,” says Sagers, who is 6-foot-5 with dirty-blonde, shoulder-length hair and a beard he says gives Irish and Scandinavian vibes. “I make for a pretty tall Jesus.”
And so it was that Sagers began a side hustle as a savior.
Models who look like Jesus are in high demand in Utah. That’s because for a growing number of people in the state, a picture isn’t complete without Him. They are hiring Jesus look-alikes for family portraits and wedding announcements. Models are showing up to walk with a newly engaged couple through a field, play with young children in the Bonneville Salt Flats, and cram in with the family for the annual Christmas card.
Since being recruited about four years ago, Sagers has posed as Jesus nearly a dozen times. Others have done so far more often, charging about $100 to $200 an hour to pose with children, families and couples at various locations in the Beehive state.
For the newly sought-after models, the job can be freighted with meaning and responsibility. Look-alikes find that people expect them to embody Jesus in more ways than the hair and beard. Some models said they feel like a celebrity when they don the robe—and get treated like one too. (One felt compelled to remind an onlooker he wasn’t the real Jesus.) Others said they’ve had their own semireligious experiences on the job.
And note this:
Finding a model can be difficult. Areas of Utah with high concentrations of Mormons—who also call themselves Latter-day Saints or LDS—tend to lack potential Jesus doppelgängers. Some men who work or volunteer for the church, one of the state’s largest employers, are required to shave every day and keep their hair short.
Here is more from the WSJ. Via The Wisdom of Garett Jones.
*The Return*
I rarely like adaptations of classics on the big screen, but I give this one (trailer) high marks. Ralph Fiennes plays Odysseus and Juliette Binoche has the role of Penelope — you cannot imagine better castings. The film is fully serious, and understands the classic text extremely well, without being slavish to it. It understands the implicit politics in the story. And while you know the ending (more or less), it is truly dramatic and suspenseful at the psychological level. Don’t be put off by the so-so reviews, how many film critics today have a decent command of Homer?
Thursday assorted links
2. China coal consumption fact of the day uh oh.
3. John Cochrane on Bob Hall and consumption.
4. Are high stock prices and tech stagnation compatible?
5. OECD on the macro productivity gains from AI. One of the better estimates in my view.
Unconventional Indicators of National Aspiration
What are your top indicators of national aspiration? Percentage of GDP devoted to R&D would be a good conventional indicator. What about some unconventional indicators? My top five:
1) Top marginal tax rate
2) Space Program
3) Distance to travel to mother’s home
4) Tallest statue
5) Cultural exports
On these, the US and India perform well. India leads on tallest statue and its space program is impressive for a developing country. Cultural exports are currently low but historically high–I would not be surprised at a rebound. A lot of eastern European countries such as Hungary and Romania have flat taxes with top rates of 10-15%. Israel has a space program.
I am always surprised by how little people tend to move from the family home. In the US:
…80% of young adults migrate less than 100 miles from where they grew up. 90% migrate less than 500 miles. Migration distances are shorter for Black and Hispanic individuals and for those from low-income families
If anything this seems to be down in the US despite the much greater ease of moving today than in the past.
Your unconventional indicator?
Hat tip: Connor.
Why are Top Scientists Leaving Harvard?
Harvard magazine has an excellent interview with three scientists, Michael Mina, Douglas Melton and Stuart Schreiber, all highly regarded in their fields of life sciences, who have recently left Harvard for the private sector.
Why did they leave? Mina tells an incredible story of what happened during the pandemic. At the time Mina was a faculty member at the Chan School of Public Health, he is extremely active in advising governments on the pandemic, and he brings Harvard millions of dollars a year in funding. But when he tries to hire someone at his lab, the university refuses because there is hiring freeze! Sorry, no hiring for pandemic research during a pandemic. In my talk on US Pandemic Policy I discuss the similar failure of the Yale School of Public Health and how miraculously and absurdly Tyler stepped in to save the day. The rot is deep.
Melton also notes the difference in speed of response between the public and private/commercial sector:
Polls have shown that principal investigator biologists now spend up to 40 percent of their time—it’s a shocking number, 40 percent of their time—writing grants.
In industry, the funding allows for very rapid change. There’s no writing a grant and waiting six months to see if it could get funded, and then waiting another six months for the university to make arrangements to receive the funds. The speed with which you can move into a new area is not comparable.
Years ago, the pharmaceutical industry rarely did discovery research. But now, pharmaceutical companies do basic science. That’s been a good shift, in my opinion, but it’s been a shift.
“The computational resources, the sequencing, the chemical screening— it’s not comparable to what we can do in any university.”
Everything gets done much quicker. For example, when you want to file for a patent at a company, the next morning there are two patent attorneys in your office ready to write that patent. The computational resources, the sequencing, the chemical screening— it’s not comparable to what we can do in any university. It’s a whole order of magnitude different.
Our last hire at GMU took well over a year to complete. It’s outrageous. There are no functional reasons why universities should be so slow. Don’t forget, Harvard has an endowment of $50 billion!
Melton also asks whether a new private-public partnership model is possible:
Why can’t we find a way—since many of our undergraduates and graduates will end up working in industry—why can’t we find a way for them to do their studies and their Ph.D. and their postdoctoral work in conjunction with Harvard, with MIT, and with Vertex? There are reasons for that, but we haven’t been imaginative enough to think about a compromise.
Hat tip: R.P.
UK fact of the day (52 snippets from 2024)
In the UK, more than half of crimes are estimated to be caused by alcohol consumption.
From Yuri, here are 51 others, not mainly about the UK: “More countries have produced a nuclear bomb than mass-produced a jet engine.”
Is Indian food the world’s best?
From my latest Bloomberg column:
Why is the food so good? I have several overlapping hypotheses, most of them coming from my background as an economist. Interestingly, India’s culinary advantages can be traced to some good and some not-so-good aspects of Indian society.
First, food supply chains here are typically very short. Trucking, refrigeration and other aspects of modernity are widespread, but a lot of supply chains are left over from a time when those were luxuries. So if you are eating a vegetable, there is a good chance it came from nearby. That usually means it is more fresh and tastes better.
The sad truth is that India still has very high rates of food spoilage, especially when food is transported longer distances. The country is making significant progress building out its transportation networks, but in the meantime the American culinary tourist enjoys the best of all worlds: Our purchasing power is high, and we can spend our money eating super-local.
And:
India also has high income inequality. That means there is plenty of cheap labor competing to cook for diners with higher incomes. The “thickness” of the competition leads to innovation and experimentation — there are a lot of restaurants, food stalls, truck stops and the like. It is a buyer’s market. Furthermore, some of India’s best dishes, such as Bengali sweets, are very labor-intensive. Indian desserts that are mediocre in US restaurants receive the proper care and attention in Kolkata.
And:
Then there is the cultural side. India is a “food nation.” When I ask locals which are the best places to eat, which I regularly do, I am repeatedly struck by how many have strong opinions. When everyone is a food critic, standards rise accordingly. It also makes it easy for the visitor to get quality recommendations.
There are further good arguments at the link. In Bangalore I had a superb meal, Kayasth food, by Manu Chandra in Lupa, this was a special menu:
*The Triumph of Politics*
The author is David A. Stockman, and the subtitle is Why the Reagan Revolution Failed. This is for me a re-read, all DOGErs and aspiring DOGErs should give this book an initial read, as it covers why the Reagan attempts to pare back government largely failed. Excerpt:
But I hadn’t recoked that there would be so much opposition on our side of the aisle. I was shocked to find that the Democrats were geting so much Republican help in their efforts to keep the pork barrel flowing and the welfare state intact. I had been worried because the votes didn’t add up, not the economic plan.
I had also come to realize that in my haste to get the Reagan Revolution launched in February, we had moved too fast. There were numerous loose ends. The spending reductions needed to pay for the tax cuts had turned out to be even bigger and tougher than I had originally thought.
And:
Over the next eight months, the President’s pen remained in his pocket. He did not veto one single appropriations bill, all of which combined came in $10 billion [sic] over the line. Come to think of it, he did use his pen — to sign them.
Stockman of course was what you might call the DOGE leader of the early 1980s. His final take is that the Reagan Revolution failed because it misunderstood what the American people truly want from their government. For better or worse, they want privilege and also protection from misfortune, not efficiency or maximum economic growth.
Essential reading, for some of you.
Wednesday assorted links
1. Scott Sumner on ngdp guardrails. o1 pro responds.
2. Michael Grunwald on factory farming and its economics and environmental impact (NYT).
3. 100 economists who signed a petition against Milei.
5. Using AI to diagnose disease through retinal images.
6. Why did the Industrial Revolution happen?
A nuclear fusion plant in Virginia?
A company pioneering the use of fusion for commercial energy plans to build the nation’s first grid-scale fusion power plant in Virginia by the early 2030s, Gov. Glenn Youngkin and other state and company officials said Tuesday.
Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), based in Massachusetts, said it will invest billions of dollars to build the unique facility, which — if the technology can be proved — promises to supply about 400 megawatts of electricity, enough energy to power about 150,000 homes, according to a state news release.
Here is more from The Washington Post.
Why you should be talking with gpt about philosophy
I’ve talked with Gpt (as I like to call it) about Putnam and Quine on conceptual schemes. I’ve talked with it about Ζeno’s paradoxes. I’ve talked with it about behaviourism, causality, skepticism, supervenience, knowledge, humour, catastrophic moral horror, the container theory of time, and the relation between different conceptions of modes and tropes. I tried to get it to persuade me to become an aesthetic expressivist. I got it to pretend to be P.F. Strawson answering my objections to Freedom and Resentment. I had a long chat with it about the distinction between the good and the right.
…And my conclusion is that it’s now really good at philosophy…Gpt could easily get a PhD on any philosophical topic. More than that, I’ve had many philosophical discussions with professional philosophers that were much less philosophical than my recent chats with Gpt.
Here is the full Rebecca Lowe Substack on the topic. There are also instructions for how to do this well, namely talk with Gpt about philosophical issues, including ethics:
In many ways, the best conversation I’ve had with Gpt, so far, involved Gpt arguing against itself and its conception of me, as both Nozick1 (the Robert Nozick who sadly died in 2002) and Nozick2 (the imaginary Robert Nozick who is still alive today, and who according to Gpt has developed into a hardcore democrat), on the topic of catastrophic moral horror.
And as many like to say, this is the worst it ever will be…
Emergent Ventures 39th cohort
Karina Bao, San Francisco, to translate the autobiography of Morris Chang.
Theodor Grether-Murray and Marta Bernardino, high school in Montreal, Portugal, noise cancelling technologies for the ocean.
Jim Larsen, Denver, electricity and infrastructure and geothermal energy in Indonesia, Substack.
Sunir Manandhar, San Francisco/Kathmandu, ports and transportation, and better automation in industrial vehicles.
Ahad Hassan, NYC, to attend a neurodiagnostics conference in Abu Dhabi.
Kenneth Sarip, high school in San Ramon, CA, neurotech.
Jasmine Sun, San Francisco, for full-time writing and Substack.
Stella Tsantekidou, London, general career support, to write a book on feminism.
Conrad Scheibe and Daniel Coupak, high school in the London area, rocket company.
Badis Labbedi, Tunisia, University of Chicago, physics and math.
Ivan Prymachenko, Kyiv, Prometheus, scalable quality online training programs for Ukrainians.
Helena Rosengarten, Berlin soon Cambridge MA, “Ozempic for sleep.”
Ansh Chopra, San Francisco, to turn classic books into video using AI.
Again, here is Nabeel Qureshi’s software for querying about EV winners.
Thomas Storrs on elastic data supply (from my email)
Regarding your post yesterday Are LLMs running out of data?, the National Archives has 13.5 billion pieces of paper and only 240 million are digitized. Some of this is classified or otherwise restricted, but surely we can do better than less than 2%.
NARA says they aim to increase this to 500 million by the end of 2026. Even with an overly generous $1/record estimate, it makes sense to me for someone to digitize much of the remaining 13 billion though the incentives are tricky for private actors. Perhaps a consortium of AI companies could make it work. It’s a pure public good so I would be happy with a federal appropriation.
Admittedly, I have a parochial interest in specific parts’ being digitized on mid-20th century federal housing policy. Nonetheless, supply of data for AI is obviously elastic and there’s some delicious low-hanging fruit available.
The National Archives are probably the biggest untapped source of extant data. There are hundreds of billions of more pages around the world though.
Tuesday assorted links
1. This year’s Spanish Scrabble champion can’t speak Spanish and doesn’t read books.
2. The changing ancestry of Russian tsars.
3. Bankers using drugs, the latest version of the story (WSJ).
4. The importance of the opening of the Suez Canal.
5. Is there a Puritan name resurgence in America?
6. From a reader: Perplexity analyzes Tyler Cowen.
8. Luke Burgis writes up the forthcoming Rene Girard documentary. And direct link to the trailer.
From this post on chip export bans:
That seems to be the real Scott from the IP address and his knowledge of our conversation. Plus it sounds like Scott (apologies if it is not!).
I would say this: since I chatted with Scott I took a very instructive and positive trip to United Arab Emirates. I am very impressed by their plans to put serious energy power behind AI projects. If you think about it, they have a major presence in three significant energy sources: fossil fuels, solar (more to come), and nuclear (much more to come). They also are not so encumbered by NIMBY constraints, whereas some of the American nuclear efforts have in the meantime met with local and regional stumbling blocks. There really is plenty of empty desert there.
So I think America has a great chance to work with UAE on these issues. I do understand there are geopolitical and other risks to such a collaboration, but I think the risks from no collaboration are greater.
This short tale is a good example of the benefits of travel.
And if you can get to Abu Dhabi, I urge you to go. In addition to what I learned about AI, I very much enjoyed their branch of the Louvre, with its wonderful Greek statue and Kandinsky, among other works, not to mention the building itself. The Abrahamic Family House, on a plaza, has a lovely mix of mosque, church, and synagogue, the latter of course being politically brave and much needed in the Middle East. Here is Rasheed Griffith on Abu Dhabi.