Category: The Arts

My days collecting Mexican art, part II

Recently I wrote about my quest to track down Mexican amate (bark paper) painter Juan Camilo Ayala, but there is another part to the early story, namely looking for his brother Marcial Camilo Ayala, also a painter.

Marcial no longer lived in Oapan, as he found village life intolerable.  So he settled in Taxco (later Cuernavaca), and it was Juan Camilo who told me that when I showed up at his house in Oapan.  Originally I was hoping to meet both brothers on that first trip.

When I arrived in Taxco on my next Mexico trip, I had the strategy of asking all tradionally-clothed women in the city center “do you know Marcial Camilo Ayala?”  Far from being a needle in the haystack strategy, this yielded results within seconds.  All of a sudden I was chatting with Marcial’s youngest daughter, Oliva.  She in turn brought me down a steep cobblestone street to see Marcial, who was painting in a dark back room in Taxco.  It all felt rather hopeless, at least at first.

Marcial and Juan were quite different.  Marcial is by far the most intellectual person from Oapan, as he could speak at high levels about Picasso and Rousseau, Zapata and land reform, Nahuatl poetry, and the late string quartets of Beethoven (alas he passed away almost ten years ago).  Juan cannot meaningfully read or write, but he is a corn farmer who knows everything about the rain.  Marcial typically is considered the strongest painter from Oapan, and multiple times he had traveled abroad for exhibits of his work.

I now had two reasons to go to the region, namely Juan and Marcial.  And so I became patrons of them both, and now have dozens of works from each of them, including some very large six foot by eight foot creations.  I kept on returning to Guerrero, and would spend some time in Oapan with Juan and his family, and some time with Marcial, either in Taxco or Cuernavaca, typically talking about ideas and art.  I finally started to learn proper Spanish from all the required back and forth.

In my time in Oapan I enjoyed the stars at night, the fiestas and processions, the long hours sitting around talking and joking with Juan’s family, and of course the food.  The musty blue corn tortillas are to die for.  If you want some fresh fish, great, but they have to go down to the river and catch it for you.  The bean tamales and moles with pepitas are incredible.  I once commissioned a barbecue meal, $80 for a full goat, cooked underground overnight, as from prehispanic barbeque traditions.  Most meals did not involve meat, however, other than the staple of eggs.

Yet life in Oapan is not easy, not even for the visitor.  There was no flush toilet or shower.  The “bed” was a hard slab, and the evening temperatures inside the room exceeded one hundred degrees Fahrenheit.  The roosters crow at 4 a.m., and then everyone is awake.  You can leave, but within the Oapan of that time, dollars could not buy you conveniences.  There is an ever-present risk of dengue and sometimes malaria as well.

I got to know the four main amate painting villages (Ameyaltepec, Xalitla, and Maxela are the others), and met virtually all the living amate painters of note.  I visited the renowned Alfonso Lorenzo Santos, both chained to the wall in his home in Ameyaltepec and also in the mental hospital in Cuernavaca.  (Alfonso was later profiled in The Wall Street Journal, and for that journalist, Bob Davis, I served as Mexico guide and translator.)  Occasionally, when looking for new amates, I had to throw rocks at the wild dogs to make my way to the homes on the edge of town.

Over the course of about a dozen years of visits, I built up what is the world’s largest and I would say best amate collection, with hundreds of quite distinct works.  I also managed to buy an important early private collection, from the 1980s, with more than two hundred paintings.  For years I tracked all the amate painting listings on eBay, snagging many a bargain.  Later I served as (unpaid) amate painting consultant to the Smithsonian, when they set up the American Indian museum now on the mall.  I am pleased that the assemblage of these works is preserving a significant cultural episode and tradition in Mexican history.

I also collected a good deal of village ceramics, still done with red clay using pre-conquest methods, noting that not all of them made it home intact.  The Spanish word “burbuja” — bubble wrap — remains prominent in my mind and vocabulary.  Ideally, I would like to do a major “air lift” of traditional pottery out of Oapan, but these days the drug gangs are a major obstacle.

Buying art works from Juan and Marcial also evolved into charity, and I developed my thoughts on direct cash transfers.  I wrote those up on MR long ago, and I am pleased to report they had some influence in inspiring the non-profit Give Directly.

Eventually I wrote a whole book on the economy and polity of Oapan, and on the lives of the amate painters.  It was published with the University of Michigan Press under the title Markets and Cultural Voices: Liberty vs. Power in the Lives of the Mexican Amate Painters.  It has sold the least well of any of my books, by far, but it is one of my favorites and it is quite unlike all the others.

Over the years, there was one amate painter whose works I never tracked down, namely Jesus Corpos Aliberto.  Marcial had told me he heard a rumor that Jesus Corpos was living in a dumpy hotel in the middle of Mexico City, Hotel Buenos Aires.  I found my way to the hotel, and yes Jesus was there with a big stack of brilliant amates he was looking to sell.  They let him stay there in a smelly back room.  Sadly he was insane, and would sell the amates only for millions of pesos.  During yet my next trip to Mexico City, I returned but the hotel was gone altogether, eliminated by gentrification.  I had no remaining links to Corpos.  At that point, and following the passing of Marcial, and the aging of the other main amate painters, that part of my life largely was over.  And so my story with amate painting ends with the same basic obstacle it started with: a stubborn refusing to sell me something, thwarted markets in everything.

Madrid’s Galería de las Colecciones Reales

Visitors don’t seem to know about this place yet, but it is one of the finest artistic venues in Spain.  Taken from the royal collections and opened only a few years ago, it has one of the best displays of 16th century Brussels tapestries you will find, perhaps the best, beautifully hung with plenty of space.  The paintings are from Goya, Velazquez, Melendez, Patinir, Mengs, Juan de Valdés, and others patronized by the Spanish rulers.  Few bad pieces in the lot.  There are also Goya tapestries, sometimes right next to associated Goya paintings.  A splendid royal carriage.

This is perhaps my sixth (?) visit to Madrid, and the place never has felt better.  Great for walking, and full of young people and small shops.  It has absolutely displaced Barcelona as the leading city in Spain.  A+ for both dining and art, and now it is the European capital of Latin America as well.  It is no longer crazy to put it in the same league as Paris or Berlin, and these days feels more like a work in progress — in the good sense of that term — than either of those other places.

My days collecting Mexican art, part I

In an earlier post I detailed my history of how I got started collecting Haitian art.  There is more to that story, but for now the point is that buying Haitian art led me into buying Mexican art as well.

I was visiting the New Jersey home of famed author and art dealer Selden Rodman, who had lived part-time in Jacmel, Haiti for decades and by then was approaching his 90s.  This was in the late 1990s.  On his wall I saw some Mexican paintings, from a small Mexican village called San Agustin Oapan (good short video), in the state of Guerrero.

The style of the art was naive, broadly similar to the major trends in Haitian art at the time.  Perspective was vertically stacked, as you might find in medieval art.  Sun and stars were prominent in the pictures, often portrayed together.  You might see angels, a tableau of the village, a procession, or village animals or a local fiesta.  Colors would be bright, or black and white.

I tried to buy the paintings, but Selden refused to sell them.  I kept on trying, but to no avail.  Finally he cackled and spit out “Well, I guess you’ll just have to go there and get some!”  As if to get rid of me, which he did.

Not one to decline such a challenge, I began to investigate the matter.  I could not find the name of the small village on any maps, including the detailed Mexico maps held in the GMU library.  Finally, I called up Selden and he gave me some vague sense where it was.  I flew to Mexico City and hired a taxi.  We drove several hours to the general area, and then started asking people on the side of the road where the village was.  We kept on being redirected, and for a while it seemed fruitless.  But eventually someone told us to take an unmarked turn from the road, not too far from Iguala.  And so we climbed the hill on an unpaved road, with the 25 km distance taking almost four hours.

The eventual taxi fare was $600, a fair amount in the Mexico of the late 1990s.

Along the way were fantastic cactuses and canyons, another small village, and the occasional person with a burro.  It was hot.  I was on my way.

When I reached the village, I was surprised by the number of pigs, by the number of drunken men lying in the street, and by the living standards, even though I had been going to Haiti.  I later learned that a family of seven might earn about $1500-2000 a year, and if seven children were born perhaps only four or five would survive to adulthood.  I thought the place at least would have a shop or a restaurant, but no.

Due to its remoteness, Oapan was still Nahuatl-speaking (the older people did not speak Spanish at all) and had preserved an especially large number of pre-Columbian customs and religious practices.  Oapan, by the way, is a Nahuatl word for “where the green maize stalk abounds.”  To this day, I consider Nahuatl to be the most beautiful and expressive language I have heard.

I started asking around for Juan Camilo Ayala, the name of the painter whose work I so admired.  It turns out there were two people with that name in the village, but eventually I found his home and knocked on the door.  I was not expecting to find a corn farmer and a bunch of domestic animals behind the door, but indeed I did.  He later related he was shocked that I came to visit, but he responded calmly in a non-plussed manner.  “Not many people come here,” he noted in his own broken Spanish.

I showed him a photo of the painting I liked in Rodman’s house, but he did not remember it.  Nonetheless he pledged to paint, if not a copy, something in the same general style and inspiration.  I asked for a large painting, and was surprised when he cited a price of only $100.

Like an idiot, I handed over an AmEx traveler’s check, and Juan Camilo thought it was dollars.  (Later on we straightened that mess out, and I started using Western Union.)

I gave them my address, which they wrote in the rafters of the home, above the screeching roosters, and I headed back down to Mexico City with the cab. Several months later a beautiful picture arrived at the house, in perfectly good condition.  It hangs on the stairwell to this very day.

I was hooked, and soon this story was to continue…

USA employment facts of the day

According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the college majors with the lowest unemployment rates for the calendar year 2023 were nutrition sciences, construction services, and animal/plant sciences. Each of these majors had unemployment rates of 1% or lower among college graduates ages 22 to 27.  Art history had an unemployment rate of 3% and philosophy of 3.2%…

Meanwhile, college majors in computer science, chemistry, and physics had much higher unemployment rates of 6% or higher post-graduation. Computer science and computer engineering students had unemployment rates of 6.1% and 7.5%, respectively…

Here is the full story.  Why is this?  Are the art history majors so employable?  Or are their options so limited they don’t engage in much search and just take a job right away?

Via Rich Dewey.

The best bookstore in NYC, and then some

McNally Jackson, in Rockefeller Center.

It reminds me of Daunt Books in London — super smart titles on display, not huge but incredible selection, sections organized by country, and if you buy a lot of books you get a free bag.  I walked in, not planning on buying anything in particular, and pretty quickly spent $500.

MOMA also has the amazing Jack Whitten exhibit, a freshly rehung 50s-70s floor (A+), a Woven Textiles and Abstraction show, and a Hilda af Klint show, botanical illustrations.  One of my best visits there ever.

I did get to see Steph and Ayesha Curry at the Time magazine event last night (the first and only time he will have to share one of his awards with me).  They are both remarkably charismatic in person, both individually and as a couple.

Sadly now I must leave town after only such a brief stint…

Noah on cultural stagnation

Fast-forward to the 2020s, and the artistic community has been largely disintermediated. If you want to be a successful commercial creator, the way to get started now is not first to struggle to prove yourself in the closed and cosseted artistic community — it’s to simply throw your work up online and see if it goes viral. If it does, you’re in.

This means that any creator whose goal is to sell out can do so without spending years making art that impresses artists. Of course, some creators still just intrinsically want to impress other artists. But if the money-motivated creators have left the community, there are just fewer people in that community left to impress. It becomes more and more niche and hipster. And there are fewer crossovers from the art world to mass culture, because the people left in the art world are the ones who don’t really care if they get famous and rich.

…But that’s the basic principle — if you want more novelty, I think you’ve got to make the artists work for each other more. How you do that, in a world where technology has made artists irrelevant as gatekeepers, is not something I have a concrete answer for. We may simply be in for a long period of artistic stagnation in America.

To sum up, I sort of believe that cultural stagnation is real, but I also think the root of the problem is probably technological — and therefore very hard to expunge.

Here is the full essay.  One question is how much stagnation we have, and I will not address that at this moment.  Another is what is the source of that degree of stagnation.  I am perhaps more inclined to blame the current quality of audience taste today.  In the past, audience taste often did very well, for instance in supporting the Beatles or Motown, or many earlier Hollywood movies, even when critical or artistic taste was mixed.  Mozart too was popular with his audiences.  Still Noah’s hypothesis is an interesting one.

Addendum: Alex and I wrote a paper on closely related issues, An Economic Theory of Avant-Garde and Popular Art.

A note on o3 and AGI

Basically it wipes the floor with the humans, pretty much across the board.

Try, following Nabeel, why Bolaño’s prose is so electrifying.

Or my query why early David Burliuk works cost more in the marketplace than do late Burliuk works.

Or how Trump’s trade policy will affect Knoxville, Tennessee.  (Or try this link if the first one is not working for you.)

Even human experts have a tough time doing that well on those questions.  They don’t, and I have even chatted with the guy at the center of the Burliuk market.

I don’t mind if you don’t want to call it AGI.  And no it doesn’t get everything right, and there are some ways to trick it, typically with quite simple (for humans) questions.  But let’s not fool ourselves about what is going on here.  On a vast array of topics and methods, it wipes the floor with the humans.  It is time to just fess up and admit that.

Balaji on the new image release

A few thoughts on the new ChatGPT image release.

(1) This changes filters. Instagram filters required custom code; now all you need are a few keywords like “Studio Ghibli” or Dr. Seuss or South Park.

(2) This changes online ads. Much of the workflow of ad unit generation can now be automated, as per QT below.

(3) This changes memes. The baseline quality of memes should rise, because a critical threshold of reducing prompting effort to get good results has been reached.

(4) This may change books. I’d like to see someone take a public domain book from Project Gutenberg, feed it page by page into Claude, and have it turn it into comic book panels with the new ChatGPT. Old books may become more accessible this way.

(5) This changes slides. We’re now close to the point where you can generate a few reasonable AI images for any slide deck. With the right integration, there should be less bullet-point only presentations.

(6) This changes websites. You can now generate placeholder images in a site-specific style for any <img> tag, as a kind of visual Loren Ipsum.

(7) This may change movies. We could see shot-for-shot remakes of old movies in new visual styles, with dubbing just for the artistry of it. Though these might be more interesting as clips than as full movies.

(8) This may change social networking. Once this tech is open source and/or cheap enough to widely integrate, every upload image button will have a generate image alongside it.

(9) This should change image search. A generate option will likewise pop up alongside available images.

(10) In general, visual styles have suddenly become extremely easy to copy, even easier than frontend code. Distinction will have to come in other ways.

Here is the full tweet.

The vanishing male writer

It’s easy enough to trace the decline of young white men in American letters—just browse The New York Times’s “Notable Fiction” list. In 2012 the Times included seven white American men under the age of 43 (the cut-off for a millennial today); in 2013 there were six, in 2014 there were six.

And then the doors shut.

By 2021, there was not one white male millennial on the “Notable Fiction” list. There were none again in 2022, and just one apiece in 2023 and 2024 (since 2021, just 2 of 72 millennials featured were white American men). There were no white male millennials featured in Vulture’s 2024 year-end fiction list, none in Vanity Fair’s, none in The Atlantic’s. Esquire, a magazine ostensibly geared towards male millennials, has featured 53 millennial fiction writers on its year-end book lists since 2020. Only one was a white American man.

Over the course of the 2010s, the literary pipeline for white men was effectively shut down. Between 2001 and 2011, six white men won the New York Public Library’s Young Lions prize for debut fiction. Since 2020, not a single white man has even been nominated (of 25 total nominations). The past decade has seen 70 finalists for the Center for Fiction’s First Novel Prize—with again, not a single straight white American millennial man. Of 14 millennial finalists for the National Book Award during that same time period, exactly zero are white men. The Wallace Stegner Fellowship at Stanford, a launching pad for young writers, currently has zero white male fiction and poetry fellows (of 25 fiction fellows since 2020, just one was a white man). Perhaps most astonishingly, not a single white American man born after 1984 has published a work of literary fiction in The New Yorker (at least 24, and probably closer to 30, younger millennials have been published in total).

Here is more from Jacob Savage at Compact.

“By your culture, we shall know ye”

From President Trump:

At my direction, we are going to make the Kennedy Center in Washington D.C., GREAT AGAIN. I have decided to immediately terminate multiple individuals from the Board of Trustees, including the Chairman, who do not share our Vision for a Golden Age in Arts and Culture. We will soon announce a new Board, with an amazing Chairman, DONALD J. TRUMP! Just last year, the Kennedy Center featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth — THIS WILL STOP. The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!

Here is the link, and I will keep an eye on what happens there and report back.

*The African Gaze: Photography, Cinema and Power*

By Amy Sall.  I love this picture book, or should I say photo book?  Most of it is reproductions of photographs from the “golden age” of African photography, with profiles of each major photographer, plus a section on cinema as well.

One very good way to find “a picture book for you” is to visit a good museum bookshop, in this case for me it was the Kimball Museum in Fort Worth.  Look around at the books with images.  Find one that intrigues you, and then buy it, take it home and read and look through it.  Do note this might cost 2x a normal book, but on average it is more than 2x better.  It will open up whole new worlds.  And it is not something your GPT is able to do (yet), though of course you can follow up with queries.

You can order the book here.

Atlas Shrugged as Novel

The conversation between Henry Oliver and Hollis Robbins about Atlas Shrugged as a novel is excellent. I enjoyed especially the discussion of some of the minor characters and the meaning of their story arcs.

Hollis: There are some really wonderful minor characters. One of them is Cherryl Taggart, this shop girl that evil Jim Taggart meets one night in a rainstorm, and she’s like, “Oh, you’re so awesome,” and they get married. It’s like he’s got all this praise for marrying the shop girl. It’s a funny Eliza Doolittle situation because she is brought into this very wealthy society, which we have been told and we have been shown is corrupt, is evil, everybody’s lying all the time, it’s pretentious, Dagny hates it.

Cherryl Taggart is brought into this. In the beginning, she hates Dagny because she’s told by everybody, “Hate Dagny, she’s horrible.” Then she comes to her own mini understanding of the corruption that we understand because Dagny’s shown it in the novel, has shown it to us this entire time. She comes to it and she’s like, “Oh my God,” and she goes to Dagny. Dagny’s so wonderful to her like, “Yes. You had to come to this on your own, I wasn’t going to tell you, but you were 100% right.” That’s the end of her.

Henry: Right. When she meets Taggart, there’s this really interesting speech she has where she says, “I want to make something of myself and get somewhere.” He’s like, “What? What do you want to do?” Red flag. “What? Where?” She says, “I don’t know, but people do things in this world. I’ve seen pictures of New York,” and she’s pointing at like the skyscrapers, right? Whatever. “I know that someone’s built that. They didn’t sit around and whine, but like the kitchen was filthy and the roof was leaking.” She gets very emotional at this point. She says to him, “We were stinking poor and we didn’t give a damn. I’ve dragged myself here, and I’m going to do something.”

Her story is very sad because she then gets mired in the corruption of Taggart’s. He’s basically bit lazy and a bit of a thief, and he will throw anyone under the bus for his own self-advancement. He is revealed to be a really sinister guy. I was absolutely hissing about him most of the time. Then, let’s just do the plot spoiler and say what happens to Cherryl, right? Because it’s important. When she has this realization and Taggart turns on her and reveals himself as this snake, and he’s like, “Well, what did you expect, you idiot? This is the way the world is.”

Hollis: Oh, it’s a horrible fight. It’s the worst fight.

Henry: Right? This is where the melodrama is so good. She goes running out into the streets, and it’s the night and there are shadows. She’s in the alleyway. Rand, I don’t have the page marked, but it’s like a noir film. She’s so good at that atmosphere. Then it gets a little bit gothic as well. She’s running through the street, and she’s like, “I’ve got to go somewhere, anywhere. I’ll work. I’ll pick up trash. I’ll work in a shop. I’ll do anything. I’ve just got to get out of this.”

Hollis: Go work at the Panda Express.

Henry: Yes. She’s like, “I’ve got to get out of this system,” because she’s realized how morally corrupting it is. By this time, this is very late. Society is in a– it’s like Great Depression style economic collapse by this point. There really isn’t a lot that she could do. She literally runs into a social worker and the social– Rand makes this leering dramatic moment where the social worker reaches out to grab her and Cherryl thinks, “Oh, my God, I’m going to be taken prisoner in. I’m going back into the system,” so she jumps off the bridge.

This was the moment when I was like, I’ve had this lurking feeling about how Russian this novel is. At this point, I was like, “That could be a short story by Gogol,” right? The way she set that up. That is very often the trap that a Gogol character or maybe a Dostoevsky character finds themselves in, right? That you suddenly see that the world is against you. Maybe you’re crazy and paranoid. Maybe you’re not. Depends which story we’re reading. You run around trying to get out and you realize, “Oh, my God, I’m more trapped than I thought. Actually, maybe there is no way out.” Cherryl does not get a lot of pages. She is, as you say, quite a minor character, but she illustrates the whole story so, so well, so dramatically.

Hollis: Oh, wow.

Henry: When it happens, you just, “Oh, Cherryl, oh, my goodness.”

Hollis: Thank you for reading that. Yes, you could tell from the very beginning that the seeds of what could have been a really good person were there. Thank you for reading that.

Henry: When she died, I went back and I was like, “Oh, my God, I knew it.”

Hollis: How can you say Rand is a bad writer, right? That is careful, careful plotting, because she’s just a shop girl in the rain. You’ve got this, the gun on the wall in that act. You know she’s going to end up being good. Is she going to be rewarded for it? Let me just say, as an aside, I know we don’t have time to talk about it here. My field, as I said, is 19th century African American novels, primarily now.

This, usually, a woman, enslaved woman, the character who’s like, “I can’t deal with this,” and jumps off a bridge and drowns herself is a fairly common and character. That is the only thing to do. One also sees Rand heroes. Stowe’s Dred, for example, is very much, “I would rather live in the woods with a knife and then, be on the plantation and be a slave.” When you think about, even the sort of into the 20th century, the Malcolm X figure, that, “I’m going to throw out all of this and be on my own,” is very Randian, which I will also say very Byronic, too, Rand didn’t invent this figure, but she put it front and center in these novels, and so when you think about how Atlas Shrugged could be brought into a curriculum in a network of other novels, how many of we’ve discussed so far, she’s there, she’s influenced by and continues to influence.