Category: Books

*Recession*, by Tyler Goodspeed

The subtitle is The Real Reasons Economies Shrink and What To Do About It.  Here is from the book’s summary:

Contrary to popular perception, recessions are not the inevitable bust that follows an unsustainable boom, and they do not operate like wildfires that clear out economic deadwood. Recessions are caused by adverse shocks like war and energy price spikes; and far from unleashing gales of creative destruction, post-recession economic growth typically resumes the same trend as before—all pain, no gain.

The book covers American history and focuses on verbal exposition of the theory, not mathematics.  Overall, Goodspeed provides an underrated perspective in an era where 2008-2009 led people to become overly obsessed with issues of aggregate demand.  Our current presidency may be curing this however!

The hyper-NIMBY of earlier Cape Town and South Africa

The most controversial of the forced removals occurred in the second half of the 1960s, with the expulsion of 65,000 coloureds from District Six, a vibrant inner-city ward of Cape Town, where whites, many of the slumlords, owned 56% of the property.  Against their will, District Six residents were moved out to the sandy townships of the Cape Flats.  In Johannesburg, the inner-city suburb of Sophiatown, where blacks could own freehold property, was another notorious site of forced removals.  Often long-established community institutions such as churches and schools had to be abandoned.

That is from the very good book by Hermann Giliomee The Afrikaners: A Concise History.

What should I ask Toby Wilkinson?

Yes I will be doing a Conversation with him.  He is one of the leading historians of ancient Egypt, and he has a recent book out on Ptolemaic Egypt, namely The Last Dynasty: Ancient Egypt from Alexander the Great to Cleopatra.

Here is his Wikipedia page, he also has served as Vice Chancellor of Fiji National University, and worked extensively as a development director for Cambridge.  Here is his personal home page.

So what should I ask him?

The alternate book universe that is South Africa

One of the things I like best about South Africa is how quickly one enters another and very different intellectual world.  Walk into a good used book shop, such as Clarke’s in Cape Town, and you find a slew of quality history books and biographies you otherwise would not have heard of.  Buy them and read them and be transported.  So many of them exist apart from the usual dialogues.  For instance, I recently bought Digging Deep – A History of Mining in South Africa by Jade Davenport.  It looks very good.  Furthermore, you cannot tell how good the books are until you pick them up and read through a bit, as most of the usual cues of cover, author and author’s affiliation, publisher and so on are absent.  Or at least unknown to me.  I had not known by the way that finance economist Emanuel Dirman comes from South Africa and wrote a personal memoir.  So many books here contain surprises once you open them.

Nowhere else is a used book store more interesting, at least from an English-language perspective.

What I’ve been reading

Frank McLynn, Villa and Zapata: A History of the Mexican Revolution.  The best book on its topic, and one of the best books on Mexican history flat out.  Everything is explained with remarkable clarity.  By the way, the central government never really has controlled the entire country, or not for very long anyway.

Sean Mathews, The New Byzantines: The Rise of Greece and Return of the Near East.  Anexcellent and original book, somewhere between a history and travel book.  Views Greece as part of “the Middle East.”  I found every page interesting.

Robert Polito, After the Flood: Inside Bob Dylan’s Memory Palace.  An informationally dense, rambling, and frequently insightful and obsessive book about the “late” career period of Bob Dylan.  When does his “late” period start?  1990 perhaps?  I remember thinking in 1990 that we were well into Dylan’s late career phase.  But that was thirty-six years ago!

Muriel Spark, The Driver’s Seat.  If you like her at all, you will be entranced by this one.  With a radical ending, as you might expect.

Richard Holmes, The Boundless Deep: Young Tennyson, Science, and the Crisis in Belief.  A fun new book on Tennyson’s relations with the science of his time, and how he drifted away from religious belief.

Partha Dasgupta, On Natural Capital: The Value of the World Around Us, is a popular summary of some of his thinking on valuing the environment and natural resources.

Davd Epstein, Inside the Box: How Constraints Make Us Better.  A good popular look at what the subtitle promises.

José Donoso, The Boom in Spanish American Literature: A Personal History is a good lshort overview, noting that Donoso’s own The Obscene Bird of Night is one of the great underrated works of 20th century literature.

My Conversation with the excellent Henry Oliver

Here is the audio, video, and transcript.  In the first half of the episode we discuss Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure, and then move on to other topics.  Here is the episode summary:

Henry Oliver is the preeminent literary critic for non-literary nerds. His Substack, The Common Reader, has thousands of subscribers drawn in by Henry’s conviction that great literature is where ideas “walk and talk amongst the mess of the real world” in a way no other discipline can match. Tyler, who has called Henry’s book Second Act “one of the very best books written on talent,” sat down with him to compare readings of Measure for Measure and range across English literature more broadly.

Tyler and Henry trade rival readings of the play, debate whether Isabella secretly seduces Angelo, argue over whether the Duke’s proposal is closer to liberation or enslavement, trace the play’s connections to The Merchant of Venice and The Rape of Lucrece, assess the parallels to James I, weigh whether it’s a Girardian play (Oliver: emphatically not), and parse exactly what Isabella means when she says “I did yield to him,” before turning to the best way to consume Shakespeare, what Jane Austen took from Adam Smith, why Swift may be the most practically intelligent writer in English, how advertising really works and why most of it doesn’t, which works in English literature are under- and overrated, what makes someone a late bloomer, whether fiction will deal seriously with religion again, whether Ayn Rand’s villains are more relevant now than ever, and much more.

Excerpt:

COWEN: Now, before doing your current work, you were in advertising for almost a decade. How do you feel that work in advertising has shaped how you read literature?

OLIVER: [laughs] I try to keep them very separate. I try not to let advertising—

COWEN: You try, but I’m sure you fail.

OLIVER: —pollute my readings of literature.

COWEN: Why is it a pollution?

OLIVER: Because advertising is not a great art, and to apply the principles of advertising to literature would be a diminishment.

COWEN: You don’t have to apply the principles. Advertising gives you insight into what people value, how people respond, and that’s also a part of literature.

OLIVER: It is if you take advertising not to mean headlines and banner ads and things like that, but to mean the calling of attention to some particular thing of importance. You can see that a lot of the great writers were very good advertisers of their own work, of their own ideas.

COWEN: Swift in particular.

OLIVER: Swift is very, very good at advertising. If you wanted to be obtuse, you could reframe his whole career as an exercise in lobbying and PR, and realize that no one’s ever been as good at it as he was.

COWEN: So, your favorite authors are the ones who are best at advertising is what you’re now telling us.

OLIVER: I have a very catholic view of literature, and I admire those writers who are practical and can do a lot of different things. I love Samuel Johnson, and one reason is that he can write a sermon, a legal opinion, an advert—almost anything you want. I think the literary talent can often be turned to those multiple uses.

COWEN: Why isn’t there more creativity in advertising? So much of it, to me, seems stupid and boring.

OLIVER: Yes.

COWEN: You would think, well, if they had a clever ad that people would talk about, it would be better, but that doesn’t happen. Is it a market failure, or it’s actually more or less optimal?

OLIVER: I don’t think it’s optimal. We don’t know how well advertising works, and we’re still impeded in that because of the laws about who you can and cannot target on the internet. I think most people would actually be surprised, if they went into an advertising agency, to learn just how poorly we can target people. Everyone thinks they’re being targeted all the time, but being followed by a toaster advert is really quite basic, and everyone uses the same toaster example because everyone’s being followed by the same bloody toaster. That’s not targeting.

I think they’ve been taken over by bad ideas. There are two competing schools of advertising. One of them is the hard sell, where you put a lot of information and facts, and you name the product a lot. “Buy this aspirin. It cures headaches three times quicker than other brands. We did a study—38 percent of people . . .” And you just hammer it all the time.

The other advertising school is image-based. Arthur Rubicam wrote those wonderful Steinway adverts. The instrument of the immortals. Have you brought great music into your home? The woman in the dress at the piano. You’re buying a whole mood or a vibe. The peak of that is like the tiger on the Frosty cereal packet. You don’t need words. Or the Marlboro Man—you buy these cigarettes. You’re going to look like that cowboy in that shirt, and you’re going to smoke. You’re going to feel like a man, and it’s just going to be great. Coors Light does that now.

Then there was this terrible, terrible thing called the Creative Revolution in the 1960s, where supposedly—this is like the modernism of advertising.

Definitely recommended, and do get out your copy of the Shakespeare.

Addendum: Here are comments from Henry.

What should I ask Katja Hoyer?

Yes I will be doing a Conversation with her.  She is the author of a forthcoming book on Weimar, namely Weimar: Life on the Edge of Catastrophe.  Note that much of the book considers the city of Weimar, mostly in Nazi times, and not just the Weimar era.  She also has published Beyond the Wall: A History of East Germany, and Blood and Iron: The Rise and Fall of the German Empire 1871-1918.  She is active in journalism, podcasting, and is a visiting research fellow at King’s College London.  She was born in East Germany and is both British and German.

So what should I ask her?

One measure of economics GOAT

Who is the greatest economist of all time? This paper provides one potential measure that, along with other considerations, can contribute to debates on who the greatest economist of all time is. We build a novel dataset on the percentage of history of economic thought textbooks dedicated to top economists, using 43 distinct textbooks (1st editions, when available) published between 1901 and 2023. As a percentage of total book pages, Adam Smith has the highest share at 6.69%, beating out Ricardo (5.22%), Mill (3.83%), and Marx (4.36%). Just over 32% of all textbooks allocated most of their pages to Adam Smith, followed by Marx with 18.6%, Mill with 13.95%, and Ricardo with 11.3%. While interesting as a history of economic thought project, such an exercise isn’t merely amusing pedantry; it can provide insight into the types of contributions, research questions, and methodologies that have had the most enduring impact in economics. It may also inform future authors of history of economic textbooks.

That is from a new paper by Gabriel Benzecry and Daniel J. Smith.  There is of course also my generative book on this topic at econgoat.ai.

*Being and Time: An Annotated Translation*

Translated from the German by Cyril Welch.

Periodically I am asked if I have read Being and Time, and I always give the same response: “I have looked at every page.”

I also have spent time with it in German, though not for every page.  But have I read it?  Read it properly?  Can anyone?

Is the book worth some study?  Yes.  But.

People, this volume is the best chance you are going to get.

Wuthering Heights, the movie

I liked it very much, noting it is not one for the purists.  The visuals and soundtrack added to the general passionate feel.  I can recommend the Jonathan Bate review and the Louise Perry review (WSJ).  The other version of this movie I can recommend is the Luis Buñuel Mexican interpretation, also full of passion and that poor pig.  At its heart, this is a very Mexican story and no way should it be done in a Masterpiece Theater kind of style.

My excellent Conversation with Joe Studwell

Here is the audio, video, and transcript.  The conversation is based around Joe’s new and very good book How Africa Works: Success and Failure in the World’s Last Developmental Frontier.  Here is part of the episode summary:

Tyler and Joe explore whether population density actually solves development, which African countries are likely to achieve stable growth, whether Africa has a manufacturing future, why state infrastructure projects decay while farmer-led irrigation thrives, what progress looks like in education and public health, whether charter cities or special economic zones can work, and how permanent Africa’s colonial borders really are. After testing Joe’s optimism about Africa, Tyler shifts back to Asia: what Japan and South Korea will do about depopulation, why industrial policy worked in East Asia but failed in India and Brazil, what went wrong in Thailand, and what Joe will tackle next.

Excerpt:

COWEN: Does Africa have a manufacturing future? Is robotics coming, AI, possibly some reshoring?

STUDWELL: Yes. I believe that Africa does have a manufacturing future.

COWEN: But making what? And at what cost of energy?

STUDWELL: They will start, as everybody does, producing garments, producing textiles, which in certain enclaves is already going on in Madagascar, in Lasutu, in Morocco, and they’ll move on to other things. They’ll start with those things because they are the most labor cost-sensitive products.

Africa is now in a position where — depending on which state you’re looking at, and taking China as a reference point — the cost of labor is now between a half and one-tenth of what it is in China. Factory labor is now around $600 a month at its cheapest. In a country like Ethiopia or Madagascar, it’s $60 or $65 a month. So, it’s a 10th of the cost, and that’s already beginning to have a bit of effect, often with Chinese firms moving production to Africa.

So, I think there is a future for manufacturing. It will depend on the extent to which African governments understand that you don’t really move forward fast for very long without manufacturing, that every developed country — apart from a few petro states and financial centers — has gone through a manufacturing phase of development. It depends on the extent to which African governments engage with that, but some, without doubt, will.

The Ethiopians, for instance, have already attempted to do that. What they’re trying to do has been somewhat derailed by the two-year civil war that took place from 2020, but they’re back on it now, and they’re trying to move forward.

The idea that robotics and AI are going to change the story I personally do not buy, principally for two reasons. One is the cost reason, because whenever people talk about what’s happening with robotics, no one ever talks about the cost of robots. In garmenting, for instance, even a basic robot will cost you in excess of $100,000, and you pay the cost upfront, and you’ve then paid that, whether there’s demand for your products or not. Also, in garmenting and in textiles, robots don’t work very well because they can’t work with material very well. They’re much better at working with solid things.

So, you’ve spent $100,000 for a robot when you can go out in somewhere like Tana in Madagascar and get another skilled — because they’ve been doing it now for 20 years — garmenting employee for $60 or $65 to make the new order that you just got. And if the order doesn’t come through, you can sack them. You see what I’m saying? There’s a point about the cost of robotics.

COWEN: But think of automation more generally — it’s not that expensive. Most countries are de-industrializing. Even South Africa has been de-industrializing for a while, and China maybe has peaked out at industrialization, measured in terms of employment. It’s hard to trust their numbers. But maybe just everywhere is going to deindustrialize, and that will be very bad for Africa.

STUDWELL: I don’t think so. I think South Africa is deindustrializing because the ANC has followed a hyper-liberal approach to economic policy. I don’t think the ANC has ever really understood economic policy, frankly, so South Africa is an outlier in that respect. There are many other states in Africa, whether Nigeria or Ethiopia, which understand they’ve got to have a manufacturing future and intend to pursue one.

Then, as I was saying, the other point is, what people miss is the flexibility with robotics and AI. There’s very limited flexibility with robotic and automated production. When demand goes up, you can’t just stick in more robots, but when demand goes up in a people-operated factory, where the cost of labor is low, you can stick in more people and produce more.

Just one example: during COVID, when everybody was having home deliveries of supermarket goods, the price of a UK firm called Ocado, which runs a supermarket, but was also developing the software and consulting around building blind warehouses went up through the roof, but now it’s down through the floor.

And only last week, Kroger supermarket in the US said, “We’re closing five of these super-modern blind warehouses.” And the reason, fundamentally, is because they lack the flexibility that human labor brings to the job. So, I’m not saying that robots, automation, and AI are not important. They are important. What I am saying is that they are not going to derail a manufacturing future for a number of African countries that aggressively pursue it.

COWEN: But there’re a lot of developing nations around the world — you could look at India, you could look at Pakistan, even Thailand — where manufacturing has not taken off the way one might have wanted. There’re just major forces operating against it. And in the US, manufacturing employment was once 37 percent of the workforce; now it’s 7 percent to 8 percent.

It just seems like it’s swimming upstream for Africa — which again, has quite expensive energy — to think it will do that well. And again, South Africa had very good technology, pretty high state capacity. I don’t see the alternate world state where a wiser ANC would have made that work.

STUDWELL: Well, oddly enough, before the end of Apartheid, the manufacturing performance of South Africa was really not bad at all, with classic industrial policy, quite high levels of protection, and so forth. I think that demand for manufactured goods will continue to be high around the world, and the labor cost will continue to be a prime determinant of where producers go for low value-added goods. So, I think that the opportunity is there for African countries.

COWEN: But say there’re transportation costs internally, energy costs, political order uncertainty. Where’s the place where people really want to put all these manufacturing firms?

Interesting throughout, recommended.